• Nu S-Au Găsit Rezultate

View of Immunogenesis of Kidney Transplantation, Maintenance of Vital Signs of Transplanted Kidney

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "View of Immunogenesis of Kidney Transplantation, Maintenance of Vital Signs of Transplanted Kidney"

Copied!
5
0
0

Text complet

(1)

http://annalsofrscb.ro

6794

Immunogenesis of Kidney Transplantation, Maintenance of Vital Signs of Transplanted Kidney

Ismoilov Ibodjon Imomjonovich1., Suleymanov Suleyman Fayzullayevich2., Nazarov Jaloliddin-Sulton Erkinovich2

1Researcher of the Department of Urology, Bukhara State Medical Institute.

2Bukhara State Medical Institute, Department of Microbiology, Virology and Immunology.

Abstract: Treatment of chronic renal failure is one of the medical and social problems for modern modern medicine. There are now a growing number of methods for the kidney and its maintenance, for example: Temporary renal hemodialysis, as well as kidney transplantation, which leads to an increase in the life expectancy of patients. But not always. At present, the number of patients in need of kidney transplantation and the number of transplant options are increasing. This is primarily due to acute and chronic renal failure, and secondly, due to the increased number of transplants.

Keywords: organ transplant, acute rejection, immunological tolerance, chronic renal failure.

Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice in patients with end-stage chronic renal failure (CRF). All over the world, there is a constant increase in the number of such patients. More than 370,000 patients receive renal replacement therapy in the United States. In 2002, more than 11 thousand kidney transplants were performed in the countries of the European Union, and in the USA - more than 12 thousand kidney transplants. Even more urgent is the problem of treating end-stage chronic renal failure for our country, where the provision of patients with end-stage chronic renal failure with renal replacement therapy is insufficient. More than 10,800 patients are currently receiving treatment with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in Russia, more than 2,500 patients with a functioning renal transplant are observed, however, the real need for renal replacement therapy is much higher (9). Kidney transplantation makes it possible not only to achieve a high quality of life for patients with end-stage chronic renal failure, but also to provide specialized care to a large number of patients in conditions of a shortage of dialysis sites.

However, a number of important problems still remain in clinical transplantation, one of which is the problem of infectious complications after kidney transplantation.

It was found that during the first year after LT, among all fatal complications, infections are the most significant, the proportion of which is at least 1/3 (10). Subsequently, infectious complications recede into second place after cardiovascular complications, but they continue to remain the most important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with kidney transplants.

The development of infectious complications after transplantation depends on the immunological status and the epidemiological environment. Immunological status is determined by the type of immunosuppressive therapy used, doses and sequence of drugs used, and the duration of treatment. An important influence is also exerted by the presence of uremia, neutropenia, anemia, hypoprotsinemia, hyperglycemia, and damage to the skin (4). Infections are not only one of the most frequent complications of the post-transplant period, but are often characterized by a severe course, unusual symptoms, which complicates the diagnosis and choice of treatment

(2)

http://annalsofrscb.ro

6795 tactics. Unfortunately, so far there are no immunosuppressive drugs that are absolutely free from infectious complications. The search continues for the most effective and at the same time safe regimens of immunosuppression after kidney transplantation (13,15). However, the incidence of infections with new immunosuppressive protocols is not fully understood. For example, there is still insufficient data on the frequency and nature of infectious complications when a new and already widely used drug mycophenolate mycophenolate mofetil (cellsept) is included in the immunosuppression protocol.

Of particular importance after organ transplantation are viral infections, most often caused by herpes viruses, primarily cygomegalovirus, Herpes simplex (type 1, 2), Herpes zoster, Epstein Barr viruses, as well as hepatitis B, C, D viruses (11). It has been established that viruses are the cause of at least 50% of all infectious complications in renal transplant recipients. The clinical significance of these infections is determined not only by the primary damage to organs and systems, but also by their immunomodulatory effect, which creates the preconditions for the development of severe superinfections, including aspergillosis, pneumocystosis, and mycoplasmosis.

A special place in clinical transplantation is occupied by cytomegalovirus infection (CMV infection), the causative agent of which is a virus from the beta-herpesvirus family. This is due to the high incidence of active CMV infection in the post-transplant period - from 20 to 60% in various transplant centers and a serious prognosis if specific therapy is not prescribed on time (12).

Treatment of patients with wound, pulmonary and urinary infections after kidney transplantation often becomes a difficult task due to the constantly changing sensitivity to antibiotics of pathogens of bacterial infections with a tendency to develop drug resistance, immunosuppressive status of patients (13). It is necessary to search for new strategies for the treatment and prevention of bacterial complications. There is no information in the available literature on the use of such a promising approach to the treatment of infectious-purulent complications as the use of bacteriophages in transplantation. At the same time, interest in phage therapy has revived in general surgical practice, oncology, and pediatrics (Perepanova T.S. et al., 1995; Lakhno V.M., Bordunovsky V.N., 2001).

One of the most challenging tasks for transplantologists and nephrologists is the management of renal transplant recipients with fever of unknown origin. The list of possible causes of this condition is very large, and the clinical picture does not have characteristic features that allow a nosological diagnosis to be established without the use of complex laboratory methods of examination. Creation of an algorithm for examination and treatment of renal transplant recipients with fever of unknown origin can shorten the diagnosis time and improve the quality of treatment for this group of patients.

One of the greatest achievements of the twentieth century is organ transplantation, which has stepped into medicine as a therapeutic alternative for organ failure and allows many patients to be saved from death for whom other options for survival do not exist. Over 106,000 organ transplants were performed worldwide in 2010, and this is an indicator of the level of development of medicine in the state. Over the past three decades, the one-year survival rate of transplanted organs has reached 90% (kidneys, liver), but the duration of their functioning due to the development of chronic transplant rejection has changed insignificantly. Acute rejection even

(3)

http://annalsofrscb.ro

6796 after liver transplantation was noted in 1/3 of patients. In most cases, it is dealt with using only traditional therapy, but in case of treatment-resistant rejection or contraindications to such treatment, it is necessary to use other means [1]. Prevention and therapy of acute rejection are effective, but are associated with significant risks, including opportunistic infections, recipient intoxication, metabolic disorders, and malignant neoplasms. The development of new therapies that do not compromise the immune system, but specifically prevent damage to allogeneic tissues, is of paramount importance for the future of transplant medicine. Induction of immunological tolerance will eliminate the need to take medications without rejection and associated side effects [2].

To achieve a state of tolerance, researchers have focused on studying the regulation of the immune response as the cornerstone of modern clinical transplantation. Observations in veterinary medicine of induced hematopoietic chimeras [3] and the pioneering work of M. Hasek and V. Demikhov, carried out back in the 50s. XX century, allowed to come closer to understanding this issue [4, 5].

Graft rejection reaction

It is known that a graft transplanted to a recipient from a genetically foreign donor does not take root and is inevitably rejected. At the same time, genetic differences between donor and recipient tissues play a key role in the development of allogeneic transplant rejection. Antigens providing intraspecific differences are designated as tissue compatibility (histocompatibility) antigens and belong to the major histocompatibility gene complex (MHC) [6]. In humans, the MHC is called HLA (human leukocyte antigen). The biological significance of MHC lies in ensuring the interaction of body cells, recognizing its own, foreign and altered own cells, triggering and implementing an immune response against carriers of foreign information, positive and negative selection of T-cell clones, presentation of the targets of the immune response.

The immunological nature of graft rejection was demonstrated by Peter Medawar in an experiment on the transplantation of a genetically alien skin graft in rabbits [7]. Both humoral and cellular mechanisms play a role in transplant rejection. Cellular rejection mechanisms cause T-lymphocytes to become sensitized to the transplanted antigens. These lymphocytes cause damage to cells of foreign tissue by either direct cytotoxicity or secretion of lymphokines. T cell damage is characterized by parenchymal cell necrosis, lymphocytic infiltration, and fibrosis.

Humoral mechanisms are mediated by antibodies that may be present in the serum of the recipient before transplantation or develop after transplantation of foreign tissue. Humoral factors damage the transplanted tissue through reactions that are equivalent to type II and III hypersensitivity reactions. The interaction of antibodies with the antigen on the surface of the transplanted cells leads to cell necrosis, and the accumulation of immune complexes in the blood vessels activates complement, which leads to the development of acute necrotizing vasculitis or chronic fibrosis of the intima with vasoconstriction.

Conclusion. Renal transplantation, renal transplant complications, impaired adaptation of the donor organism to the transplanted kidney are associated with the immunogenesis of the individual organism. Changes in the physiological activity of class T lymphocytes in the body

(4)

http://annalsofrscb.ro

6797 after kidney transplantation are accompanied by changes in all immunogenetic conditions in the body, which leads to a decrease in renal vital signs, resulting in renal complications, decreased vital signs of renal transplantation within three years.

References

1.

Infections in kidney transplant recipients treated wift mycophenolate mofetil // X L I Congress of ERA-EDTA. - Lisbon, Portugal. - 2004. - P. 404 / Schetbakova E,Vatazin A., Pasov S., Budnikova N., Agafonova S.

2.

Raychaudhuri S.P., Kundu-Raychaudhuri S., Tamura K., et al. FR255734, a humanized, Fc- Silent, Anti-CD28 antibody, improves psoriasis in the SCID mouse-psoriasis xenograft model. J.

Invest. Dermatol. 2008;128:1969-1976. PMID:18337836 DOI:10.1038/jid.2008.38

3.

Le Blanc K. Immunomodulatory effects of fetal and adult mesenchymal stem cells.

Cytotherapy. 2003; 5(6) :48 5 — 48 9. PMID: 146 60044 DOI:10.1080/14653240310003611

4.

Owen R.D. Immunogenetic consequences of vascular anastomoses between bovine twins.

Science. 1945;102:400401. DOI: 10.1126/science. 102.2651.400 PMID:17755278

5.

Demikhov V.P. A new and simpler variant of heart-lung preparation of a warm-blooded animal. Bull. Eksp. Biol. Med. 1950; (7): 21—27.

6.

Hasek M., Puza A. On the induction of immunological tolerance in adult recipients. Folia Biol (Praha). 1962;8:55—57. PMID:13905162

7.

Marsh S.G., Albert E.D., Bodmer W.F., et al. Nomenclature for factors of the HLA system, 2010. Tissue Antigens. 2010;7 5(4) :291 — 455. PMID:2035 6336 DOI:10.1111/j.1399- 0039.2010.01466.x

8.

Medawar P.B. A second study of the behaviour and fate of skin homografts in rabbits A Report to the War Wounds Committee of the Medical Research Council. J. Anat. 1945;79(Pt 4):157—176.4. PMID:17104981

9.

Хубутия М.Ш. (ред.) Трансплантация органов и тканей в многопрофильном научном центре. М.: АирАрт, 2011.

10.

Webster AC, Woodroffe RC, Taylor RS et al. Tacrolimus versus ciclosporin as primary immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients: Meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomized trial data. BMJ 2005; 331: 810.

11.

Ekberg H, Tedesco-Silva H, Demirbas A et al. Reduced exposure to calcineurin inhibitors in renal transplantation. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 2562–2575.

12.

Rostaing L, Cantarovich D, Mourad G et al. Corticosteroid-free immunosuppression with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and daclizumab induction in renal transplantation.

Transplantation 2005; 79: 807–814.

13.

Ekberg H, Grinyo J, Nashan B et al. Cyclosporine sparing with mycophenolate mofetil, daclizumab and corticosteroids in renal allograft recipients: The CAESAR Study. Am J Transplant 2007;7: 560–570

14.

Suleymanov S.F., Mansurova M. Kh., Sagdullayeva G.U, Nazarov J.S.E ./ Immune status in patients with duodenal ulcer and influence on her immunomodulatory therapy.

ACADEMICIA: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal. 2019, Volume : 8, Issue : 12 DOI : 10.5958/2278-4853.2019.00325.2

(5)

http://annalsofrscb.ro

6798

15.

Sagdullayeva G.U., Nazarov J.S.E, Suleymanov S.F., Olimova N.I. Comparative analysis of the immune system at often and rarely ill children depending on the stage of disease.

ACADEMICIA: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal. 2019, Volume : 9, Issue : 12 DOI : 10.5958/2249-7137.2019.00118.6

16.

Suleymanov Suleyman Fayzullayevich. Disorders Of The Immune System And Their Immunological Rehabilitation In Patients With Chronic Pancreatitis.European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine. Volume 07, Issue 03, 2020

Referințe

DOCUMENTE SIMILARE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate kidney morphology, prevalence of urinary stone, resistance to blood flow and renal perfusion using US in patients with AS without

The ultrasound differential diagnosis of the simple cyst is made with a kidney hydatid cyst (thick wall, inner septa), necrotizing renal tumors, polycystic kidney, the

The purpose of the case report is to show that contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is an important imaging modality for patients with impaired renal function in

The disease is observed in all patients with clinical and laboratory manifestations of kidney inflammation, renal echographic changes are noted, which can be divided

Chronic Renal Failure (CRF) is a gradual worsening of renal function in which the body is unable to maintain metabolic and fluid resulting in uraemia which further

The primary goal of this study is to detect and diagnose chronic kidney diseases (CKDs), specifically kidney stones, cystic kidneydisease, and suspected renal carcinoma.. CKDs

Low serum albumin levels are strongly associated with cardiovascular disease, heart failure and mortality especially in elderly population.[16–19] Albumin levels are not present

In particular, diets with high fat arerelated with insulin resistance, asfatty acid composition play an important role in insulin resistance development by effecting on membrane