• Nu S-Au Găsit Rezultate

View of Some remarks on Hilbert's integral inequality

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "View of Some remarks on Hilbert's integral inequality"

Copied!
8
0
0

Text complet

(1)

Rev. Anal. Num´er. Th´eor. Approx., vol. 34 (2005) no. 1, pp. 71–78 ictp.acad.ro/jnaat

SOME REMARKS ON HILBERT’S INTEGRAL INEQUALITY

LJ. MARANGUNI ´Cand J. PE ˇCARI ´C

Abstract. A generalization of the well-known Hilbert’s inequality is given. Sev- eral other results of this type obtained in recent years follow as a special case of our result.

MSC 2000. 26D15.

Keywords. Hilbert’s inequality, H¨older’s inequality, Beta function.

1. INTRODUCTION

First, let us recall the well known Hilbert’s integral inequality:

Theorem A. If f, gL2(0,∞), then the following inequality holds:

(1.1)

Z

0

Z

0

f(x)g(y)

x+y dxdy≤π

Z

0

f2(x) dx

Z

0

g2(x) dx

1 2

,

where π is the best constant.

In the recent years a lot of results with generalization of this type of in- equality were obtained. Let us mention two of them which take our attention.

Theorem B. (Gavrea, [1]) i) Let a be a real number such that a > 1. If f, gL21a, a, then:

(1.2)

a

Z

1 a

a

Z

1 a

f(x)g(y)

(x+y)λ dxdy≤Ka(λ)

a

Z

1 a

x1−λf2(x) dx

a

Z

1 a

x1−λg2(x) dx

1 2

,

where:

Ka(λ) =

a

Z

1 a

xλ−22

(1+x)λdx, λ >0.

Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, Unska 3, Zagreb, Croatia, e-mail: [email protected].

Faculty of Textile Technology, University of Zagreb, Pierottijeva 6, Zagreb, Croatia, e-mail: [email protected].

(2)

ii) Let 0< a < b. If f, gL2(a, b), then:

(1.3)

b

Z

a b

Z

a

f(x)g(y)

(x+y)λ dxdy≤Kpb a

(λ)

b

Z

a

x1−λf2(x) dx

b

Z

a

x1−λg2(x) dx

1 2

.

Theorem C (Brneti´c and Peˇcari´c, [2]). If f, g are real functions and λ, p, q >0, 1p+1q = 1, then the following inequalities hold and are equivalent:

(1.4)

Z

0

f(x)g(y)

(x+y)λ dxdy < Bλ2,λ2

Z

0

xp−1−2 fp(x) dx

1 p

Z

0

xq−1−2 gq(x) dx

1 q

and

(1.5)

Z

0

yλp2 −1

Z

0

f(x) dx (x+y)λ

p

dy < Bpλ2,λ2

Z

0

xp−1−2 fp(x) dx, where B is a beta-function.

In this paper we generalize inequalities (1.2) and (1.3). As a special case of our results we obtain Theorem C.

In the rest of our paper we suppose that all integrals converge.

2. MAIN RESULTS

A generalization of inequalities (1.2) and (1.3) is given in the following theorem:

Theorem 1. Let 0 < a < b. If f, g are real functions and p, q > 0,

1

p +1q = 1, then:

(2.1)

b

Z

a b

Z

a

f(x)g(y)

(x+y)λ dxdy≤Kpb a

(λ)

b

Z

a

xp−1−2 fp(x) dx

1 p

b

Z

a

xq−1−2 gq(x) dx

1 q

,

where

Kpb a

(λ) = pb

a

Z

a b

xλ−22

(1+x)λdx, λ∈R+.

Proof. Our proof consists of two steps. In the first step we prove the fol- lowing lemma:

(3)

Lemma1. Let abe a real number such that a >1. Iff, gare real functions and p, q >0, 1p +1q = 1, then:

(2.2)

a

Z

1 a

a

Z

1 a

f(x)g(y)

(x+y)λ dxdy≤Ka(λ)

a

Z

1 a

xp−1−2 fp(x) dx

1 p

a

Z

1 a

xq−1−2 gq(x) dx

1 q

,

where

Ka(λ) =

a

Z

1 a

xλ−22

(1+x)λdx, λ∈R+. Proof. We start with the following equality:

(2.3)

a

Z

1 a

a

Z

1 a

f(x)g(y)

(x+y)λ dxdy =

a

Z

1 a

a

Z

1 a

f(x)x

2−λ 2q y

2−λ 2p

(x+y)λp

·

g(y)y

2−λ 2p x

2−λ 2q

(x+y)λq

dxdy.

By H¨older’s inequality and (2.3), we have:

a

Z

1 a

a

Z

1 a

f(x)g(y)

(x+y)λ dxdy ≤

a

Z

1 a

a

Z

1 a

fp(x) (x+y)λ ·x

p(2−λ) 2q

y2−λ2 dxdy

1 p

a

Z

1 a

a

Z

1 a

gq(y) (x+y)λ ·y

q(2−λ) 2p

x2−λ2 dxdy

1 q

=

a

Z

1 a

a

Z

1 a

fp(x) (x+y)λ ·x

p(2−λ) 2q ·x2−λ2 x2−λ2 ·y2−λ2

dxdy

1 p

×

×

a

Z

1 a

a

Z

1 a

gq(y) (x+y)λ ·y

q(2−λ) 2p ·y2−λ2 y2−λ2 ·x2−λ2

dxdy

1 q

=

a

Z

1 a

fp(x)x

(2−λ)(p−q) 2q

a

Z

1 a

y

x

λ−2 2

(x+y)λdy

dx

1 p

×

(4)

×

Za

1 a

gq(y)y

(2−λ)(q−p) 2p

Za

1 a

x y

λ−22 (x+y)λ dx

dy

1 q

=

Za

1 a

fp(x)x

(2−λ)(p−q)

2q Ixdx

1 p

Za

1 a

gq(y)y

(2−λ)(q−p)

2p Iydy

1 q

, (2.4)

where we denoteIx = Z a

1 a

y

x

λ−2

2 (x+y)−λdy,Iy = Z a

1 a

x

y

λ−2

2 (x+y)−λdx.

Using the change of variables y=xt, dy=xdt we have forIx: Ix=

a

Zx

1 ax

tλ−22

(x+xt)λxdt=x1−λ

a

Zx

1 ax

tλ−22

(1 +t)λdt=x1−λh(x) and similarly: Iy =y1−λh(y).

Since x1a, a we conclude thath(x) = Z a

x 1 ax

tλ−22 (1 +t)−λdt≥0, and for λ >0 hstrictly increasing on a1,1and strictly decreasing on (1, a) (see also [1]). Hence:

(2.5) h(x)h(1) =

a

Z

1 a

tλ−22

(1 +t)λ dt=Ka(λ).

Using this inequality, (2.4) can be rewritten as:

a

Z

1 a

a

Z

1 a

f(x)g(y)

(x+y)λ dxdy≤

a

Z

1 a

fp(x)x

(2−λ)(p−q)

2q +1−λ

h(1) dx

1 p

a

Z

1 a

gq(y)y

(2−λ)(q−p)

2p +1−λ

h(1) dy

1 q

=Ka(λ)

a

Z

1 a

fp(x)xp−1−2 dx

1 p

a

Z

1 a

gq(y)yq−1−2 dy

1 q

and the Lemma is proved.

Remark1. Inequality (2.2) is a generalization of Theorem B i). We obtain

(1.2) by puttingp=q = 2 in (2.2).

(5)

We continue proving our Theorem 1 by rearranging (2.2). We put qab instead a,b > a, and obtain:

pb

a

Z

a

b

pb

a

Z

a

b

f1(x1)g1(y1)

(x1+y1)λ dx1dy1 ≤ (2.6)

Kpb a

(λ)

pb

a

Z

a b

f1p(x1)xp−1−

2

1 dx1

1 p

pb

a

Z

a b

gq1(x1)xq−1−

2

1 dx1

1 q

.

Now we transform X1OY1XOY by putting x = x1

ab, y = y1ab.

Taking into account

∂x1

∂x

∂y1

∂x1 ∂x

∂y

∂y1

∂y

=

1

ab 0

0 1

ab

= ab1,qab

ab=a, qb

a

ab=b, we obtain:

b

Z

a b

Z

a

f1x

ab

g1y

ab

x

ab +y

ab

λ ·dxdy ab

Kpb a

(λ)

Zb

a

xp−1−2

(ab)12(p−1−2 )f1px

ab

dx

ab

1 p

×

×

b

Z

a

xq−1−2

(ab)12(q−1−2 )gq1x

ab

dx

ab

1 q

. (2.7)

Replacingf1x

ab

withf(x) andg1y

ab

withg(y) we rewrite inequality (2.7):

b

Z

a b

Z

a

f(x)g(y)

(x+y)λ ·(ab)λ2

ab dxdy≤

Kpb

a

(λ)

Zb

a

xp−1−2 fp(x)(ab)12(p−1−2 )

ab dx

1 p

×

(6)

×

Zb

a

xq−1−2 gq(x)(ab)12(q−1−2)

ab dx

1 q

.

By dividing both sides of the last inequality with

(ab)λ2−1 = (ab)12+2p1+4p2p112+2q1+4q2q1

we obtain (2.1), thus completing the proof of Theorem 1.

Remark2. Inequality (2.1) is a generalization of Theorem B ii). We obtain

(1.3) by puttingp=q = 2 in (2.1).

A generalization of inequalities (1.4) and (1.5) is given in the following theorem:

Theorem 2. Let 0< a < b. If f is a real function and p >1, then:

(2.8)

b

Z

a

yλp2 −1

b

Z

a

f(x) dx (x+y)λ

p

dy≤Kpp b

a

(λ)

b

Z

a

xp−1−2 fp(x) dx.

Also, (2.1)and (2.8)are equivalent.

Proof. Let us show that (2.1) and (2.8) are equivalent.

First suppose that inequality (2.1) is valid. Denoting g(y) =

b

Z

a

f(x) dx (x+y)λ

p−1

yλp2 −1 we have:

Zb

a

yλp2−1

Zb

a

f(x) dx (x+y)λ

p

dy=

=

b

Z

a

yλp2−1

b

Z

a

f(x) dx (x+y)λ

p−1 b

Z

a

f(x) dx (x+y)λdy

=

b

Z

a

g(y)

b

Z

a

f(x) dx (x+y)λdy=

b

Z

a b

Z

a

f(x)g(y) (x+y)λ dxdy

Kpb a

(λ)

b

Z

a

xp−1−2 fp(x) dx

1 p

b

Z

a

yq−1−2 gq(y) dy

1 q

=Kpb

a

(λ)

Zb

a

xp−1−2 fp(x) dx

1 p

×

(7)

×

b

Z

a

yq−1−2 yλpq2 −q

b

Z

a

f(x) dx (x+y)λ

(p−1)q

dy

1 q

=Kpb a

(λ)

b

Z

a

xp−1−2 fp(x) dx

1 p

×

×

b

Z

a

yλp2−1

b

Z

a

f(x) dx (x+y)λ

p+q−q

dy

1 q

.

By putting:

I =

b

Z

a

yλp2−1

b

Z

a

f(x) dx (x+y)λ

p

dy, we can write the last inequality in the following form:

IKpb a

(λ)

b

Z

a

xp−1−2 fp(x) dx

1 p

×I1q,

wherefrom we have (2.8).

Now let us suppose that inequality (2.8) is valid. By applying H¨older’s inequality (in one variable) and (2.8) we have:

b

Z

a b

Z

a

f(x)g(y)

(x+y)λ dxdy=

=

b

Z

a

y

q−1− 2 q

b

Z

a

f(x) dx (x+y)λ

y

q−1− 2

q g(y) dy

=

b

Z

a

b

Z

a

y

q−1− 2

q f(x)

(x+y)λdx

y

q−1− 2

q g(y) dy

b

Z

a

y

p(q−1−2)

q

b

Z

a

f(x) dx (x+y)λ

p

dy

1 p

b

Z

a

yq−1−2 gq(y) dy

1 q

=

b

Z

a

yλp2 −1

b

Z

a

f(x) dx (x+y)λ

p

dy

1 p

b

Z

a

yq−1−2 gq(y) dy

1 q

,

wherefrom we have (2.1). Since (2.1) has already been proved, the inequality

(2.8) holds, too.

(8)

Remark3. Fora→0,b→ ∞we haveKpb a

(λ)→Bλ2,λ2and we obtain

Theorem C as a special case of our result.

REFERENCES

[1] Gavrea, I.,Some Remarks on Hilbert’s Integral Inequality, Mathematical Inequalities &

Applications,3, pp. 473–477, 2002.

[2] Brneti´c, I. and Peˇcari´c, J., Generalizations of inequalities of Hardy-Hilbert type, Mathematical Inequalities & Applications,7, no. 2, pp. 217–225, 2004.

Received by the editors: November 25, 2004.

Referințe

DOCUMENTE SIMILARE