• Nu S-Au Găsit Rezultate

View of Detection of Cryptosporidium Spp. in Domestic Dogs by Conventional and Molecular Method in Karbala Province Iraq

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "View of Detection of Cryptosporidium Spp. in Domestic Dogs by Conventional and Molecular Method in Karbala Province Iraq"

Copied!
8
0
0

Text complet

(1)

Detection of Cryptosporidium Spp. in Domestic Dogs by Conventional and Molecular Method in Karbala Province Iraq.

Jihad Talib Obaid AL-Yasary and Azhar Ali Faraj

Department of medical laboratory Technique, AL-Safwa UniversityCollege Department of Parasitology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Baghdad , Iraq

Abstract

Cryptosporidium spp was detected and identified in Domestic dogs in Karbala province in Iraq by conventional methods and confirmed by molecular diagnosis by using a nested polymerase chain reaction (nPCR) technique by outer primer 18s (9005bp) and inner primer 18s (830bp) were used. This was conducted during the period from beginning of December (2019) to September (2020). A total of 200 samples were collected from adult and young and from both sexes of dogs.result was record infection rate of Cryptosporidium spp in dogs 34.5 % (69/200).

The higher infection rate 34.76% (44/79), was recorded in young’s dogs than adult dogs 30.25%

(25/121), and the higher infection rate according to sex was found in females than males 48.27%

(42/87) and 23.89% (27/113) respectively. The various infection rates were recorded during the months of the study, A higher infection rates 56% (14/25) in December (2019) and the lower infection rate 16% (4/25) infection rate in July.

The infection rates in dogs in DNA samples showed 47% (47/100) that were collected randomly from total 200 fecal samples of dogs in Karbala city. In dogs Phylogenetic analysis was done by use outer 18s (900bp) primers and outer (830bp). The result of the sequence analysis for 10 isolates randomly from the positive nested PCR samples recorded at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) was indicate 7 isolate Cryptosporidium parvum and their accession number (MT329015.1 - MT329013.1) and 3 isolate Cryptosporidium canis and their accession number (MT329014.1, MT329016.1, and MT329018.1).

1.Introduction

Cryptosporidiosis is an important zoonotic parasitic disease caused by Cryptosporidium spp. Are apicomplexan parasites that have a wide occurrence in developed and developing countries and have major Public and Veterinary concern. The disease affects humans and a variety of animal species including the stray and domestic dogs (9)(23). Cryptosporidium infects a wide range of animal species. Studies on Cryptosporidium isolates obtained from cattle, sheep, pigs, cats, dogs, kangaroos, squirrels,Ostriches and other mammals, have shown that most

(2)

species are infected with a restricted host-adapted Cryptosporidium spp or genotype (24).(25).(1).

Cryptosporidium parvum was thought to infect all animals . However, it is generally accepted that C. parvum infects primarily ruminants and humans (12). C. parvum infections have been found occasionally in other mammals such as mice and dogs, although companion animals are most often infected with host-specific Cryptosporidium spp. (25).Then,cryptosporidiosis in dogs has been reported worldwide, involving both asymptomatic and diarrheic dogs (21).

Although Cryptosporidium oocysts are frequently detected in dog faeces, most infected animals have normal stools (10)(26). Due to few reports on the molecular analysis of the various Cryptosporidium species in domestic dogs, the study design to including the following aims.Detection of Cryptospridium spp. In domestic dogs by traditional methods and effect of age, sex and months on infection rate, Identification of Cryptosporidium oocysts by Nested-PCR and genotyping by sequences and phylogenetic tree.

2. Materials and Methods 2.1.Microscopic examination

Collected of 200 hundred fecal samples fromdomestic dogs from different sex and age from severalarea of Karbala province, during the study period from start of December (2019), to end of September 2020, each sample used for Flotation Methodsby Sheather's sugar solution(5)and stained with modified Ziehl-Neelsen staining technique (4).

2.2.Molecular examination.

DNA extraction, the kit used for DNA extraction from (Geneaid, Korea)as per the manufacturer’sinstruction. The DNA samples were stored at -80˚C untilfurther use. To identify Cryptosporidium spp. in the faecalsamples, fragments covering 18S rDNA gene were

amplifiedby nested PCR. First, amplification of the

900bpCrypto18S1(FTTCTAGAGCTAATACATGCG.And.Crypto18S1.R.CCCATTTCCTTCG AAACAGGA) regionwas carried out, and next, for secondary PCR, the 830bp (Crypto18S2F GGAAGGGTTGTATTTATTAGATAAAG.and.Crypto18S2R.CTCATAAGGTGCTGAAGGA GTA)fragment was amplified using 3 µl of the first PCR product.Primers, mixture composition and PCR conditions have beendescribed by(18). The secondary PCR productswere examined electrophoretically in 1% agarose gels andvisualized after staining with Advance DNAstain. The identified species typing analysis was done by phylogenetic tree analysis in comparison with NCBI-Blast known sequences.The Statistical Analysis System according to (20).

3. RESULT .

3.1. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. in dogs by using microscopic examination

The morphological appearance and measurement of oocyst by microscopic examination showed the Cryptosporidium spp by using floatation sheathers sugar solution and

(3)

modified ZehielNeelsine stain, the oocyst appear spherical to oval shapes surrounded by thin membrane and contain undistinguished four sporozoites and purple with blue background and its size by using ocular micrometer was ±4µm × ±5.2µ (Fig.1)

Figure (1). Morphology of Cryptosporidium spp. by using Sheather's sugar solution and modified Ziehl-Neelsen stain

A total infection rate in dogs 34.5 % (69/200)were positive for Cryptosporidium oocysts and Prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. according to age of animals, the young dogs, which recorded the high infection rate were 34.76% (44/79), while the lower infection rate 30.25%

(25/121) was among the adult dogs, as in (Table.1).and prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp.

according to Sex, a significant difference between the rate of infection and the major cases were among females, which recorded the highest percentage 48.27% (42/87), while the lows percentage 23.89% (27/113) was found in the males (Table. 2). prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. in dogs according to months, higher infection rate with Cryptosporidium 56% (14/25) in December (2019) and the lowest 16% (4/25) infection rate in July. (Table.3).

Table (1): Total of infection rate Cryptosporidium spp in dogs according to age.

Age stage Total number Positive Percentage (%)

Young's 79 44 55.69

Adults 121 25 20.66

Total 200 69 34.5%

Chi-Square (χ2) --- --- 9.163 **

** (P≤0.01).

(4)

Table(2): Total of infection rate of Cryptosporidium spp. according to sex of Dogs.

Sex Total number Positive Percentage (%)

Males 113 27 23.89

Females 87 42 48.27

Total 200 69 34.5%

Chi-Square (χ2) --- --- 8.663 **

** (P≤0.01).

Table(3):Total of infection rate of Cryptosporidium spp. in dogs according to months.

Months Number of samples Positive Percentage (%)

December (2019) 25 14 56

January (2020) 25 11 44

February 25 9 36

March 0 0 0

April 0 0 0

May 25 8 32

June 25 6 24

July 25 4 16

August 25 6 24

September 25 11 44

Total 200 69 34.5

Chi-Square (χ2) --- --- 14.882 **

** (P≤0.01).

3.2. infection rate ofCryptosporidium spp. In dogs by using nested PCR Technique.

the total infection rates in dogs in DNA samples showed 47% (47/100) positive that among 100 examined the fecal samplesthat were collected randomly from total 200 fecal samples of dogs in Karbala city. In dogs Phylogenetic analysis was done by use outer 18s (900bp) primers and outer (830bp). The result of the sequence analysis for 10 isolates randomly from the positive nested PCR samples recorded at the NationalCenter for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) was indicate 7 isolate C.parvum and their accession number(MT329015.1- MT329013.1) and 3 isolate C.canisand their accession number(MT329014.1 - MT329018.1).(Figure.4) and (Figure.5) .

(5)

Discussion.

Prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. In dogs by Microscopic Examination the total infection rate with Cryptosporidium spp. In dogs that was 34.5 % (69/200), which was in agreementwith previous study in Iraq by(6), he was recorded the rate of Cryptosporidium spp.in dogs was 42%. Also agree with (17) he was found the rate of infection in Egypt by using microscopic examination was 35%. Alsoin Iraq our result didn’t identical to result of(3), she was record the rate of infection in dogs was 15%. In Iran (11),Zambia (14) and Poland(16).They find the infection rate was 8% , 5.9 % and 2.7% respectively our result disagreement with them.

With regard to the effects of age on Cryptosporidiosis,the results ofpresent study found highest rate of infection in young’s dogs were 34.76% (44/79),while the lower infection rate 30.25% (25/121) in the adult dogs.the results are in agreement with the studies that in Iraq were done by(6)(3), their studies recorded an infected rate highest in young’s were 61.11% and 20%

respectively and in adult were 31.25% and 10% respectively. The results are in agreement with study inEgypt done by (17), who recorded 50% prevalence infectionin young’s dogs compared with adults animals, it was 10%. In china (8). Whorecorded 12 % prevalence infection in young’s dogs compared with adults animals, it was 5 % also agree with them. In South Africa prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp in adult higher than Puppies were 19% and 6% respectively (1), disagree with them.

The result showed A significant difference between the rate of infection and the major of Cryptosporidium cases were among females, which recorded the highest percentage 48.27%

(42/87), while the lows percentage 23.89% (27/113) was found in the males.The results were inline agreed withthe study that in Iraq was done by(3),she was find the high prevalence of infection in females 21.42% and males were 8.5%. Agree with study conducted in Iran the higher infection rate recorded in females were 11/135 (8.14%) and the lower in males were 17/215 (7.9%) conduct by (11). In China the higher infection rate showed in female than male was 22 (7.6) and 9 (4.7) respectively by (8). Our result disagree with (17)in Egypt,the distribution of Cryptosporidium infection was higher inmale household dogs than females 38.9% and 21.4%

respectively.

Prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. in dogs According to Months,Cryptosporidiuminfection was showed highest rate in December (2019),January(2020), September,February and May were 56%, 44%, 44%, 36% and 32% respectively, then the infection rate was decrease during ,June,August and July were 24%,24% and 16 % respectively.These results are in line with study in Thailand conducted by (19).Who was recorded higher prevalence in winter was 9.7% and lower in rainy session was 6%. Also our result don’t similar the results obtained by (13). In Iran, he was recorded the highest rate in autumn was 3.9% and lower rate in winter was 0.8%.

(6)

Infection rate and phylogenetic of Cryptosporidium spp. In dogs by using PCR Technique.

The frequency of infection rates in dogs in DNA samples showed 47% (47/100) positive that among 100 examined the fecal samplesthat were collected randomly from total 200 fecal samples of dogs in Karbala city. In Iraq only one previous study was by (3), she found the prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. In dogs by using PCR technique was 28.6% . Infection rate of Cryptosporidium spp. By using molecular technique Iran 12.3%was done by (11).The prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. In dogs in Egypt by Molecular Screening 24% was found by (17), disagree with them. Also our result different In China was recorded by (8)and in Japan by (15),they found infection rates of Cryptosporidium spp. in dogs by using PCR were 6.9% and 21.0% respectively. In Poland Cryptosporidium spp. were identified by nested PCR in canine stool samples 3.4% was done by (16).

BLAST analysis of ten samples selected randomlyfor the sequences to confirmed the species ofCryptosporidium strains, which had already been identified by nested PCR. The present Results of molecular study showedSequences obtainedby genotyping were compared with sequences depositedin GenBank basefound of two Cryptosporidium species in dogs: C.

parvum and C. canisGenotyping analysis of the PCR-positive samples from dogs identified C.parvum in Iraq by(15).Our results were in agreement with results recorded by (9).In Poland he recorded 3 cases of C. canis and 2 cases of C.parvum in dogs were detected.In Italy the sequence analysis revealed that seven dogs harbouredC. parvum and one dog was infected with C. canis(2).Thesequence analysis of the Cryptosporidium-positive canine samples in Chania by (22), revealed that presence of C. canisand C. parvum.While(7), he was only recorded C. canis in chain’s dogs. Also in Chain (8), Whorecorded three species were identified as positive for C.

canis, C. muris and the Cryptosporidium rat genotype IV.

Reference

1- Al- Zubaidei. H. H, Kawan, M. H.(2020).Prevalence of Cryptosporidiosis in Ostriches from Central and South Parts of Iraq. The Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 44 (1):

63-67.

2- Amidou, S., Machuene, A.T and Pascal, B.(2013).The epidemiology of Cryptosporidium in cats and dogs in the Thohoyandou region, South Africa. African Journal of Microbiology Research, Vol. 7(21), pp. 2510-2518.

3- Annunziata, G., Raffaella, I., Barbara, P., Donato, T and Gioia, C. (2006). Molecular evidence for Cryptosporidium infection in dogs in Central Italy. Parasitol Res ,V. 99:

P,297–299

4- Azhar, A. F.(2019).traditional and molecular study of Cryptosoporidium spp. in domestic dogs in baghdadcity,Iraq. Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences –50(4):1094-1099.

5- Beaver, P. C. and Jung, R. C. (1985). Animal agent and vectors of human disease. 5thed.

Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, pp 249.

6- Boufassa, Q. S. and Chermette. D. (1988). Cryptosporidiosis a Cosmopital Disease inAnimals and Man, 2nd ed. Office International Epizooties. France.

(7)

7- Hadi, E. D., Suleiman, E. G., Al-Obadi, Q. T and Arslan, S. H. (2014). Diagnostic study of Cryptosporidium spp. And Giardia spp. In stray dogs and cat in Mosul city, Iraq. Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Sciences. folder 28.pp 19-28.

8- Jian,F., Meng, Q., Xiaoyi, H., Rongjun, W., Sumei, Z, Heping, D and Longxian, Z.

(2014). Occurrence and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium in dogs in Henan Province, China. BMC Veterinary Research. 1746-6148. P.4-4.

9- Jiayu, L, Xiaoyu, D., Kexin, Z., Na, L., Yaqiong, G., Zezhong, Z., Yaoyu, F and Lihua, X. (2019).Genetic characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia duodenalis in dogs and cats in Guangdong, China.J. Parasites Vectors ,12:571 /10.1186/s13071-019- 3822-.P.9-9

10- Liu, H., Shen, Y., Yin, J., Yuan, Z., Jiang, Y., Xu, Y., Pan, W., Hu, Y and Cao, J. (2014).

Prevalence and genetic characterization of Cryptosporidium, Enterocytozoon, Giardia andCyclospora in diarrheal outpatients in China.BMC Infectious Diseases.14(1), 290–292.

11- McKenzie. E, Riehl. J, Banse. H, Kass. P.`H, Nelson. S J. and Marks. S.L.(2010).

Prevalence of diarrhoea and enteropathogens in racing sled dogs. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 24, 97–103, 2010

12- Mehdi, T; Elham, Kord; Rahman, A and Fatemeh, A.(2017). Molecular Study of Cryptosporidium spp. in Dogs from Southwest ofIran. Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology, PP.1-6.

13- Mendonca, C., A. Almeida., A. Castro., M. de Lurdes Delgado., S. Soares., J. M. da Costa and N. Canada. 2007. Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium and Giardia isolates from cattle from Portugal. Vet Parasitol. 147: 47-50.

14- Mohammad, M. (2012). Epidemiology survey of Cryptosporidium spp. In companion and stray dogs in Kerman, Iran. J. veterinary italiana,V(48) 3,P.291-296.

15- Mugala, L; Siwila, J; Saasa, N and Pandey, G. S. (2018). Prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. oocysts in dogs in Lusaka district of Zambia, Veterinary World, 11(5): 585-589.

16- Naoyuki, I., Hazuki, T., Yuko, I., Satoshi, K and Yuya, K. (2019). Molecular Prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. in Breeding Kennel Dogs. Korean J Parasitol Vol. 57, No. 2:

197-200.

17- Piekara,S. A; Piekarska, J and Gorczykowski, M.(2020). Cryptosporidium spp. in dogs and cats from Poland. Ann Agric Environ Med. doi: 10.26444/ aaem/120467

18- Rasha, M.A. G; Abdallah, M.A. M; Ayman, A. S and Amany, M. A.E. (2018). Molecular Screening and Genotyping of Cryptosporidium Species in Household Dogs and In-Contact Children in Egypt: Risk Factor Analysis and Zoonotic Importance. vector-borne and zoonotic diseases, DOI: 10.1089/vbz.2017.2254. P.P.1-9.

19- Ryan, U., Xiao, L., Read, C., Zhou, L .,Lal, A.A and Pavlasek. I .(2003). Identification of Novel Cryptosporidium Genotypes from the Czech Republic. Appl Environ Microbiol.

2003; 69:7 4302–4307.

20- Sahatchai, T. (2013). Molecular epidemiology of Giardia and Cryptosporidium in Dogs and Cats in Chiang Mai, Thailand. Thesis For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado.

21- SAS. 2012. Statistical Analysis System, User's Guide. Statistical. Version 9.1th ed. SAS.

Inst. Inc. Cary. N.C. USA.

22- Santın. M and Trout. J.M.(2008). Companion animals. In: Fayer R, Xiao L (eds Cryptosporidium and Cryptosporidiosis. Pp. 437–50. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2008.

(8)

23- Shenquan, L., Xuhui, L., Yongxiang, S., Nanshan, Q., Minna, L., Caiyan, W., Juan, L., Junjing, H., Linzeng,Y., Haiming, C., Wenwan, X., Mingfei, S and Guoqing, L. (2020).

Occurrence and genotypes of Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia duodenalis, and Blastocystis sp. in household, shelter, breeding, and pet market dogs in Guangzhou, southern China.

Scientificreports. doi.org/V,10.1038/s41598-020-74299-P,1-11.

24- UkamakaUchennaEze, IkennaEzeh, Terry. Nzeakor and SamuCAttam.(2019). Prevalence and risk factors associated with Cryptosporidium spp. infection in local breed of dogs in Enugu State, Nigeria, 12(5):729-734

25- Xiao, L., fayer, R., Ryan, U. and Upton S.J., (2004). Cryptosporidium taxonomy: recent advances and implications for public health. Clin. Microbiol. Rev., 17: 72–97.1726.

26- Xiao, L. and R. Fayer. 2008. Molecular characterization of species and genotypes of Cryptosporidium and Giardia and assessment of zoonotic transmission. Int J Parasitol. 38:

1239-1255.

27- Yoshiuchi. R, Matsubayashi. M, Kimata. I, Furuya. M, Tani. H and Sasai K.(2010).

Survey and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium and Giardia spp. in owned companion animal, dogs and cats, in Japan. Veterinary Parasitology 174, 3136, 2010

Referințe

DOCUMENTE SIMILARE

One hundred and twenty four patients, both male and females of different ages, visiting teaching hospital at the College of Dentistry /University of Mosul city / Iraq

As a result ,ZNO NPs were successfully synthesized and its treatmeant by 3-aminopropyl triethoxysilane (APTES) then 2-(ferrocenylmethylamino)benzonitril then were

'I.he roots of tiris polynornial ctluation can lre explessecl irr telms t¡f lhe coefficients Jr,, i.c.. Such overclelelrninecl systern can be solvetl in the I;1

The reason is roughly that under the high voltage, the electric field strength is very strong, the electromigration speed of the O 2- ion is very large, the O 2- ions in the

Plasma concentration profile of transdermally applied A1 and DA1 nanoemulsion showed greater bioavailability of drug absorption than the oral tablet formulation shown in Table

First, we will take into account the properties of pseudoclefts and specificational sentences in Romanian (sections 2 and 3), then we detail some of the constraints on the

Putting together the pieces: depicting the synchronic parallels and differences regarding DOM and CLD in Spanish and Catalan Diachronic research (Fischer 2002, von Heusinger

From the pro- gramming point of view, we will assume that you already have a clear concept of what data is needed to solve the problem, and what algorithms will be acting on the