View of Study on Distribution of Phytoplankton Collected from Palair Lake, Khammam, Telangana, India

Download (0)

Full text

(1)

4630 http://annalsofrscb.ro

Study on Distribution of Phytoplankton Collected from Palair Lake, Khammam, Telangana, India

Kolakani Sumalatha*1 and Dr. Nirmala Babu Rao1

1. Department of Botany, University college of Science, Osmania University, Hyderabad

ABSTRACT:

Limnological studies have been conducted on three stations of Palair Lake over a period of two years starting from 2013 to 2015. A monthly variation in quality of the water has been studied. Rapid population growth, growing living standards, a wide range of human activities, industrialization, and greater food production stress have all contributed to the contamination of aquatic ecosystems. In the vast majority of situations, pollutants induce observable changes in abiotic and biotic communities.

The number of phytoplankton is used as an indicator of water quality because they rely on it for survival and dominance. Diatoms are widely distributed and have a remarkable ability to ingest and exhibit water quality variations. The result indicates that all the three stations are good and can be used for domestic and irrigation purpose.

KEYWORDS: Limnological studies,Quality ofPalair Lake, Permissible limits,Domestic and Irrigation purpose.

INTRODUCTION: Water covers more than two-thirds of our world, and marine waters account for nearly all of the liquid water (Charette and Smith, 2010). Tardent, 2005; Gruber et al., 2009; Häder et al., 2011) estimate that marine ecosystems produce half of all biomass on Earth, despite their standing crop accounting for only 1% of total terrestrial biomass. While prokaryotic and eukaryotic phytoplankton account for more than 90% of photosynthetic carbon fixation in the oceans, macroalgae and seagrasses account for less than 1% of marine ecosystems yet play critical roles in carbon cycles in coastal areas. These organisms provide the foundation of complex food webs that feed successive layers of the food chain, eventually providing food for the rising human population.

Falkowski et al., 2000; Zepp et al., 2007) estimate that marine ecosystems absorb around 26 million tonnes of anthropogenically produced CO2 each day, which is equal to all terrestrial ecosystems combined (Gao et al., 2012b). As a result, they serve a critical role in regulating CO2 levels in the atmosphere and reducing the severity of extreme weather and temperature events (Chester and Jickells, 2012).

STUDY AREA :Khammam, also known as Khammamett, is the city in Khammam district of the Indian state of Telangana. It is the fourth largest city in the state.

In our investigation we have taken lake which are as follows….

PalairLake-station I:

PalairLake- station II:

PalairLake- stationIII:

(2)

Water samples for phytoplankton estimation was taken. Sedimentation was performed after adding 15 mL of 4 percent formaldehyde and 10 mL of lugol's iodine to a 1000mL composite sample.

Sedimentation in glass columns was used to identify the samples. Finally, the sediment was reduced to 20 mL and placed in a vial for storage. Each vial had one drop carefully placed on a slide, which was then covered with a cover slip. The sedimented material was inspected using an electronic microscope. Five high-power field (15x X 45x) observations, one in each corner of the cover slip and one in the centre, were used to estimate the algal populations.

Phytoplankton has been identified to species level using monographs and research papers. The algae in lake has been identified and classified. The physicochemical and biological data from three stations, as well as the trophic state of the lake, were used for ecological considerations of the waters.

Phytoplankton was counted using Lackey's drop method (Lackey, 1938; Vollenweider, 1969), as described in APHA (1995), plus Saxena's adjustments (1987). Phytoplanktons were counted using organisms per litre (Org/L).

Formula used for the calculation of phytoplankton as Org/L is Phytoplankton Org/L=n x v / V * 100

n= No of phytoplankton counted in 0.1ml concentrate.

v = Total volume of concentrate in ml.

V = Total volume of water filtered through net.

RESULTS: The results are represented in tabular format

TABLE-1 AVERAGE VALUES OF PHYTOPLANKTON IN PALAIR LAKE -STATION-I (2013-2015)

Cyanophyceae 118.956

Chlorophyceae 100.261

Bacillariophyceae 79

Euglenophycae 0.78261

(3)

4632 http://annalsofrscb.ro

Fig.1

TABLE-2 AVERAGE VALUES OF PHYTOPLANKTON IN PALAIR LAKE -STATION-II (2013-2015)

Cyanophyceae 91.333

Chlorophyceae

83

Bacillariophyceae 69.25

Euglenophycae 0.708

118.956

100.261 79

0.78261

AVERAGE VALUES OF PHYTOPLANKTON IN PALAIR LAKE-STATION-I (2013-2015)

Cyanophyceae Chlorophyceae Bacillariophyceae Euglenophycae

(4)

Fig.2

TABLE-3 AVERAGE VALUES OF PHYTOPLANKTON IN PALAIR LAKE -STATION-III (2013-2015)

Cyanophyceae 93.25

Chlorophyceae

82.70

Bacillariophyceae 69.45

Euglenophycae 0.79

91.333

83 69.25

0.708

AVERAGE VALUES OF PHYTOPLANKTON IN PALAIR LAKE-STATION-II (2013-2015)

Cyanophyceae Chlorophyceae Bacillariophyceae Euglenophycae

(5)

4634 http://annalsofrscb.ro

Fig.3

DISCUSSION ON TABLES:Members of the Cyanophyceae family are the most numerous in Station I. The majority of the amount was made up of phytoplankton. Stations I,II and III have an average population of 118.956,91.333 and 93.25 respectively. At three sites, Chlorophyceae came in second, with 100.261 at Station I,83 at Station II and 82.70 Station III. Members of the Bacillariophyceae ranked third, with about 79 at Station I,69.25 at Station II and 69.45 at Station III . 0.78,0.708 and 0.79 of Euglenophyceae members were in fourth place at stations I II and III, respectively.

Cyanophyceae > Chlorophyceae> Bacillariophyceae>Euglenophyceae

CONCLUSION: Phytoplankton productivity is impacted by a wide range of environmental factors, many of which are influenced by human activity, resulting in massive fluctuations as a result of global climate change, ozone depletion, and pollution (Behrenfeld et al., 2006). One of the most critical factors affecting phytoplankton primary productivity is temperature (Lewandowska and Sommer, 2010; Thyssen et al., 2011). Only a few organisms show a positive net photosynthetic activity below freezing (Staehr and Sand-Jensen, 2006; Boyd et al., 2013). Increasing temperatures improve production until active carbon sequestration declines or ends, or organisms die, i.e., species are adapted to a thermal window for photosynthetic output (Huertas et al., 2011). During the preceding 135 years, mean global temperatures have risen as long as systematic measurements exist (Lawrimore et al., 2011). Over the preceding 112 years, manmade climate change has caused global water temperatures to rise by roughly 1°C (Fischetti, 2013). Deoxygenation can be induced by rising

93.25

82.7 69.45

0.79

AVERAGE VALUES OF PHYTOPLANKTON IN PALAIR LAKE-STATION-III (2013-2015)

Cyanophyceae Chlorophyceae Bacillariophyceae Euglenophycae

(6)

marine species in extreme cases (Howarth et al., 2011; Carstensen et al., 2014).

The result of this analysis, point out the fact that all the stations are under permissible limits of phytoplankton. The result indicates that the lake is good and can be used for domestic and irrigation purpose.

REFERENCES:

1. APHA 1995. Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewater, 16th edition, American Public Health Association, Washington DC.

2. Behrenfeld, M., O'Malley, R., Siegel, D., McClain, C., Sarmiento, J., Feldman, G., et al. (2006).

Climate-driven trends in contemporary ocean productivity. Nature 444, 752–755. doi:

10.1038/nature05317

3. Boyd, P. W., Rynearson, T. A., Armstrong, E. A., Fu, F., Hayashi, K., Hu, Z., et al. (2013). Marine phytoplankton temperature versus growth responses from polar to tropical waters–Outcome of a scientific community-wide study. PLoS ONE 8:e63091. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063091.

4. Chester, R., and Jickells, T. (2012). Marine Geochemistry. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

5. Charette, M. A., and Smith, W. H. F. (2010). The volume of Earth's Ocean. Oceanography 23, 112–

114. doi: 10.5670/oceanog.2010.51

6. Carstensen, J., Andersen, J. H., Gustafsson, B. G., and Conley, D. J. (2014). Deoxygenation of the Baltic Sea during the last century. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 5628–5633. doi:

10.1073/pnas.1323156111.

7. Dorgham et al.,(2004)M.M. Dorgham, N.E. Abdel-Aziz, M.A. Okba Eutrophication problems in the Western Harbour of Alexandria, Egypt.

8. Falkowski, P., Scholes, R. J., Boyle, E., Canadell, J., Canfield, D., Elser, J., et al. (2000). The global carbon cycle: a test of our knowledge of Earth as a system. Science 290, 291–296. doi:

10.1126/science.290.5490.291.

9. Fischetti, M. (2013). Deep heat threatens marine life. Sci. Am. 308:92. doi:

10.1038/scientificamerican0413-92.

10. Gao, K., Xu, J., Gao, G., Li, Y., Hutchins, D. A., Huang, B., et al. (2012b). Rising CO2 and increased light exposure synergistically reduce marine primary productivity. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 519–523.

doi: 10.1038/nclimate1507.

11. Gruber, N., Gloor, M., Fletcher, S. E. M., Doney, S. C., Dutkiewicz, S., Follows, M. J., et al. (2009).

Oceanic sources, sinks, and transport of atmospheric CO2. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 23, GB1005.

doi: 10.1029/2008GB003349.

12. Häder, D.-P., Helbling, E. W., Williamson, C. E., and Worrest, R. C. (2011). Effects of UV radiation on aquatic ecosystems and interactions with climate change. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 10, 242–

260. doi: 10.1039/c0pp90036b.

13. Howarth, R., Chan, F., Conley, D. J., Garnier, J., Doney, S. C., Marino, R., et al. (2011). Coupled biogeochemical cycles: eutrophication and hypoxia in temperate estuaries and coastal marine ecosystems. Front. Ecol. Environ. 9, 18–26. doi: 10.1890/100008.

14. Huertas, I. E., Rouco, M., López-Rodas, V., and Costas, E. (2011). Warming will affect phytoplankton differently: evidence through a mechanistic approach. Proc. R. Soc. B 278, 3534–

3543. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.0160.

(7)

4636 http://annalsofrscb.ro

16. Lawrimore, J. H., Menne, M. J., Gleason, B. E., Williams, C. N., Wuertz, D. B., Vose, R. S., et al.

(2011). An overview of the Global Historical Climatology Network monthly mean temperature data set, version 3. J. Geophys. Res. (1984–2012) 116. doi: 10.1029/2011JD016187.

17. Lewandowska, A., and Sommer, U. (2010). Climate change and the spring bloom: a mesocosm study on the influence of light and temperature on phytoplankton and mesozooplankton. Mar. Ecol. Prog.

Ser. 405, 101-111. doi: 10.3354/meps08520.

18. Oceanologia, 46 (1) (2004), pp. 25-44.

19. Previdi, M., and Polvani, L. M. (2014). Climate system response to stratospheric ozone depletion and recovery. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 140, 2401–2419. doi: 10.1002/qj.2330.

20. Saxena, M.M. 1987. Environmental Analysis - Water, Soil and Air. Agro Botanical Publishers, India 21. Seguin, F., Le Bihan, F., Leboulanger, C., and Bérard, A. (2002). A risk assessment of pollution:

induction of atrazine tolerance in phytoplankton communities in freshwater outdoor mesocosms, using chlorophyll fluorescence as an endpoint. Water Res. 36, 3227–3236. doi: 10.1016/S0043- 1354(02)00013-1.

22. Solomon, S.(ed.). (2007). Climate Change 2007—The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I.

Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

23. Staehr, P. A., and Sand-Jensen, K. (2006). Seasonal changes in temperature and nutrient control of photosynthesis, respiration and growth of natural phytoplankton communities. Freshw. Biol. 51, 249–262. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2005.01490.x

24. Totti.C., G. Civitarese, F. Acri, D. Barletta, G. Candelari, E. Paschini, A. Solazzi,(2000),Seasonal variability of phytoplankton populations in the middle Adriatic sub-basin,J. Plankton Res., 22 (9) (2000), pp. 1735-1756.

25. Tardent, P. (2005). Meeresbiologie, Eine Einführung. Stuttgart: Thieme.

26. Thyssen, M., Ferreyra, G., Moreau, S., Schloss, I., Denis, M., and Demers, S. (2011). The combined effect of ultraviolet B radiation and temperature increase on phytoplankton dynamics and cell cycle using pulse shape recording flow cytometry. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 406, 95–107. doi:

10.1016/j.jembe.2011.06.015.

27. Ungar, S. (2012). Ozone Depletion. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

28. United Nations Environment Programme Environmental Effects Assessment Panel. (2012).

Environmental effects of ozone depletion and its interactions with climate change: progress report, 2011. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 11, 13–27. doi: 10.1039/c1pp90033a

29. Vollenweider, R.A., ed. 1969. Manual on Methods for Measuring Primary Production in Aquatic Environments. Int. Biol. Program Handbook 12. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Publications. 213pp.

30. Waldbusser, G. G., and Salisbury, J. E. (2014). Ocean acidification in the coastal zone from an organism's perspective: multiple system parameters, frequency domains, and habitats. Ann. Rev.

Mar. Sci. 6, 221–247. doi: 10.1146/annurev-marine-121211-172238.

31. Zepp, R. G., Erickson, D. J., Paul, N. D., and Sulzberger, B. (2007). Interactive effects of solar UV radiation and climate change on biogeochemical cycling. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 6, 286–300.

doi: 10.1039/b700021a.

32. Zhao S, Fan Y, Dai Y, Wang F, Liang W (2019) Responses of phytoplankton community to abiotic environmental variables with the mitigation of eutrophication: a case study of Donghu Lake, Wuhan City. J Lake Sci 31:1310–1319.

Figure

Updating...

References

Related subjects :