Several inequalities of Erdős-Mordell type
Mihály Bencze and Marius Drăgan
Str. Hărmanului 6, 505600 Săcele-Négyfalu, Jud. Braşov, Romania E-mail: [email protected]
61311 bd. Timişoara Nr. 35, Bl. 0D6, Sc. E, et. 7, Ap. 176, Sect. 6, Bucureşti, Romania E-mail: [email protected]
ABSTRACT. The purpose of this paper is to obtain some inequalities between sum or product of power to order,k∈[0,1]relate to distences from an interior pointM of triangleABC to the vertices of triangle, radii of triangleM BC, M CA, M ABand distances from M to the sidesBC, CA, AB and using this inequalities and an inversion of polM and ratiotin conexion with verticesA, B, Cto obtain many other new inequalities.
1 INTRODUCTION
Let be M an interior point of triangle ABC,Ra, Rb, Rc the radii of the circumscribe of triangles
M BC, M CA, M AB, R1, R2, R3the distances fromM to the verticesA, B, C andr1, r2, r3 the distances fromM to the sidesBC, CA, AB.
The inequality Erdős-Mordell
R1+R2+R3≥2 (r1+r2+r3) (1.1) is true in any triangle ABC.
Also a generalization of Erdős-Mordell appears in [1] who said that:
x2R1+y2R2+z2R3≥2 (yzr1+zxr2+xyr3) (1.2) is true for any real numbersx, y, z≥0.
If we takeλ1=x2, λ2=y2, λ3=z2 are true inequality λ1R1+λ2R2+λ3R3≥2(√
λ2λ3r1+√
λ3λ1r2+√ λ1λ2r3
)
(1.3)
who appears in [2].
Also
λ21Ra+λ22Rb+λ23Rc≥λ1λ2λ3
(R1
λ1 +R2
λ2 +R3
λ3 )
(1.4)
Who are published in [3].
In the following we give a lot of inequalities of this type and many other in connection with them.
Lemma 1. Let beM an interior point of triangle ABC.Then we have:
a). 1≥ac ·2RR3b +ba·2RR2c b). 1≥ab ·2RR3b +ac ·2RR2c
Proof.
a). We use the well-known inequality
aR1≥cr2+br3
and the equality
r1= R2R3
2Ra who result writing the area of triangle MBC
S△ABC =R2R3
4Ra = ar1
2 b). It result from the inequality
aR1≥br2+cr3
Lemma 2. Let beM an interior point of triangle ABC.Then we have:
R2 Rc
+R3
Rb ≤4 sinA 2
We considerU =prABM , V =prMAC. u=µ(∡U AM), v=µ(∡V AM).We have r2+r3=R1(sinu+ sinv) = 2R1sinA
2 cosu−v
2 ≤2R1sinA 2 or
R3R1
2Rb +R1R2
2Rc ≤2R1sinA 2 Who is equivalent with the inequality from the statement.
Theorem 1. Let beM a interior point of triangle ABC. Then for every real numberk∈[0,1], λ1, λ2, λ3≥0.We have:
a). λ1Rka+λ2Rkb+λ3Rkc ≥√
λ2λ3Rk1+√
λ3λ1R2k+√ λ1λ2Rk3 b). √
λ2λ3RkRk1
b+Rkc +√
λ3λ1RkRk2
c+Rak+√
λ1λ2RkRk3
a+Rkb ≤
≤ 12 (√
λ2λ3 Rk1
√RkbRkc +√ λ3λ1
Rk2
√RkcRka +√ λ1λ2
Rk3
√RkaRkb
)
≤ λ1+λ22+λ3 Proof. a). From the inequality(x+y)k≥2k−1(
xk+yk)
, k∈[0,1]it result that:
(a c · R2
2Ra +b c · R1
2Rb )k
≥2k−1 ([(a
c
)k Rk2 (2Ra)k +
(b c
)k( R1
2Rb )k])
Using this inequality and Lemma 1. We obtain
1≥ (a
c · R2
2Ra +b c· R1
2Rb )k
≥2k−1 [(a
c
)k Rk2 (2Ra)k +
(b c
)k( Rk1 2Rb
)k]
or
2≥ak ck ·R2k
Rak +bk ck ·Rk1
Rkb or
2λ3Rkc ≥λ3
ak ck · Rkc
Rka ·Rk2+λ3
bk ck ·Rkc
Rkb ·Rk1 and the similar inequalities
2λ2Rkb ≥λ2ck bk ·Rkb
Rkc ·Rk1+λ2ak bk ·Rkb
Rka ·Rk3
2λ1Rka ≥λ1bk sk ·Rka
Rkb ·Rk3+λ1ck ak · Rka
Rkc ·Rk2 Adding this inequalities and apply the A-M inequalities we obtain:
2(
λ1Rka+λ2Rbk+λ3Rkc)
≥Rk1 (
λ3·bk ck · Rkc
Rkb +λ2· ck bk · Rkb
Rkc )
+
+R2k (
λ3·ak ck ·Rkc
Rka +λ1· ck ak · Rka
Rkc )
+Rk3 (
λ2· ak bk ·Rkb
Rka +λ1· bk ak ·Rka
Rkb )
≥
≥2√
λ2λ3R1k+ 2√
λ3λ1Rk2+ 2√ λ2λ1Rk3
b). Adding the inequalities
2λ3≥λ3·ak ck · Rk2
Rka +λ3· bk ck ·Rk1
Rkb
2λ1≥λ1· bk ak ·Rk3
Rkb +λ1· ck ak · Rk2
Rkc
2λ3≥λ2·ck bk ·Rk1
Rc+λ2·ak bk ·Rk3
Rka We obtain
2 (λ1+λ2+λ3)≥ (
λ3·ak ck · Rk2
Rka +λ1· ck ak ·Rk2
Rkc )
+
+ (
λ3·bk ck ·Rk1
Rkb +λ2·ck bk ·Rk1
Rkc )
+ (
λ1· bk ak ·Rk3
Rkb +λ2· ak bk ·Rk3
Rka )
≥
≥2√
λ1λ3· Rk2
√RkaRkc + 2√
λ2λ3· Rk1
√ RkbRkc
+ 2√
λ1λ2· Rk3
√ RkaRkb
≥
≥4√
λ1λ3· Rk2
Rka+Rkc + 4√
λ2λ3· Rk1
Rkb+Rkc + 4√
λ1λ2· Rk3 Rak+Rkb
We observe that b) imply⇒ a)
Indeed putting in b). λ1→λ1Rka, λ2→λ2Rkb, λ3→λ3Rkc,we obtain
√
RkbRck· Rk1·√ λ2λ3
Rbk+Rck +
√
RkcRka· Rk2·√ λ3λ1
Rka+Rkc +
√
RkaRkb ·Rk3·√ λ1λ2
√
Rka+Rkb
≤
1 2
(λ1Rk1+λ2Rk2+λ3Rk3)
≤1 2
(λ1Rak+λ2Rkb +λ3Rck)
Also putting in b). λ1→λ1Rkb, λ2→λ2Rkc, λ3→λ3Rka andλ1→λ2Rkb, λ2→λ3Rkc, λ3→λ1Rka,we obtain:
Theorem 2. Let beM an interior point of triangleABC. Then for ecery real numberk∈[0,1], λ1, λ2, λ3≥0, we have:
a).
√λ2λ3·Rk1√ Rkc ·Rka Rkb+Rkc +√
λ3λ1· Rk2
√ Rka·Rkb Rka+Rkc +√
λ1λ2·Rk3
√ Rkb ·Rkc Rka+Rkb ≤
≤1 2
√ λ2λ3Rk1
√ Rka Rkb +√
λ3λ1Rk2
√ Rkb Rkc +√
λ1λ2R3k
√ Rkc Rka
≤
≤ 1 2
(λ1Rkb +λ2Rkc+λ3Rka) b).
√λ3λ1·R1k√ Rkc ·Rka Rkb+Rkc +√
λ1λ2· Rk2
√ Rka·Rbk Rkc +Rka +√
λ2λ3·Rk3
√ Rbk·Rkc Rka+Rkb ≤
≤1 2
√ λ3λ1Rk1
√ Rka Rkb +√
λ1λ2Rk2
√ Rkb Rkc +√
λ2λ3Rk3
√ Rkc Rka
≤
≤ 1 2
(λ2Rkb +λ3Rkc+λ1Rka)
If in Theorem 1 and 2 we takeλ1=λ2=λ3 we obtain
Corollary 2.1. a).
Rka+Rkb +Rkc ≥Rk1+Rk2+Rk3 b).
Rk1
Rkb +Rkc + Rk2
Rkc +Rka + Rk3
Rka+Rkb ≤ 1 2
Rk1
√ RkbRkc
+ Rk2
√RkcRka + R3k
√ RkaRkb
≤3 2
c).
Rk1√ RkcRka Rkb +Rak +
Rk2
√ RkaRbk Rka+Rkc +
Rk3
√ RkbRkc Rka+Rkb ≤ 1
2
Rk1
√ Rka Rkb +Rk2
√ Rkb Rkc +Rk3
√ Rkc Rka
≤
≤ 1 2
(Rka+Rkb +Rkc)
If we take k= 1in a). we obtain the following inequality
Ra+Rb+Rc≥R1+R2+R3
who appears in [1].
Also if we takek= 1 in b). we obtain:
R1
Rb+Rc + R2
Rc+Ra + R3
Ra+Rb ≤1 2
( R1
√RbRc
+ R2
√RaRb
+ R3
√RaRb
)
who represent a refinement of inequality RR1
b+Rc +RR2
c+Ra +RR3
a+Rb ≤32 who apperas in [2].
If we take in c). k= 1we obtain R1
√RcRa
Rb+Rc +R2
√RaRb
Ra+Rc +R3
√RbRc
Ra+Rc ≤ 1 2
( R1
√Ra
Rb +R2
√Rb
Rc +R3
√Rc
Ra )
≤
≤ 1
2(Ra+Rb+Rc) If in Theorem 2) we takeλ1→λ21, λ2→λ22, λ3→λ23,we obtain
Corollary 2.2. Let beM an interior point of triangleABC. Then for every real numberk∈[0,1], λ1, λ2, λ3≥0, we have
λ21Rka+λ22Rkb +λ23R2c ≥λ1λ2λ3
(Rk1 λ1 +Rk2
λ2 +Rk3 λ3
) If we take k= 1we obtain
λ21Ra+λ22Rb+λ23Rc≥λ1λ2λ3
(R1
λ1 +R2
λ2 +R3
λ3 )
who represent just inequality (1.4).
Corollary 2.3. Let be M an interior point of triangleABC.Then for every real numberk∈[0,1]we have
a).
Rk1Rka+Rk2Rkb +Rk3Rkc ≤RkaRbk+RkbRkc +RckRka b).
1 + Rkb Rkc +Rkc
Rkb ≥ Rk1
√ RkbRkc
+ Rk2
√ RkaRkb
+ Rk3
√RkaRkc
and similar inequalities c).
Rk1Rka+R2k
√
RkbRkc +Rk3
√
RkbRkc ≤RkaRkb +RkbRkc +RkcRkb and similar inequalities
d).
Rka Rkb +Rkb
Rkc +Rck
Rak ≥ Rk1
√RkcRka + Rk2
√ RkbRka
+ Rk3
√ RkbRck
and similar inequalities e).
Rk1
√
RakRkb +Rk2
√
RkbRkc +Rk3
√
RkaRkc ≤RkaRkb +RkbRkc +RkcRkb Proof. We take in theorem 1
(λ1, λ2, λ3) = ( 1
Rak, 1 Rbk, 1
Rck )
,(λ1, λ2, λ3) = ( 1
Rka, 1 Rkb, 1
Rkc )
(λ1, λ2, λ3) = ( 1
Rbk, 1 Rak, 1
Rck )
,(λ1, λ2, λ3) = ( 1
Rkb, 1 Rkc, 1
Rka )
(λ1, λ2, λ3) = ( 1
Rck, 1 Rak, 1
Rbk )
,(λ1, λ2, λ3) = ( 1
Rkc, 1 Rkb, 1
Rka )
Corollary 2.4. Let be M an interior point of triangleABC.From every real number k∈[0,1],we have:
a).
Rk1 Rkb +R2k
Rck +Rk3 Rka ≤Rbk
Rck +Rkc Rka +Rka
Rkb
b).
Rk1 Rkb
√ Rka Rkc +Rk2
Rkc
√ Rkb Rka +Rk3
Rka
√ Rkc Rkb ≤Rbk
Rak +Rkc Rkb +Rka
Rkc
c).
Rk1 Rkb +R2k
Rck
√ Rkb
Rka + Rk3
√ RkbRka
≤Rkb Rkc +Rkc
Rkb + 1
and similar inequalities d).
Rk1
√ RkbRkc
+ Rk2
√RkcRka + Rk3
√ RkaRkb
≤3
Proof. We take in Theorem 2:
(λ1, λ2, λ3) = ( 1
Rak, 1 Rkb, 1
Rkc )
,(λ1, λ2, λ3) = ( 1
Rka, 1 Rkb, 1
Rkc )
(λ1, λ2, λ3) = ( 1
Rbk, 1 Rka, 1
Rkc )
,(λ1, λ2, λ3) = ( 1
Rkb, 1 Rkc, 1
Rka )
(λ1, λ2, λ3) = ( 1
Rck, 1 Rka, 1
Rkb )
,(λ1, λ2, λ3) = ( 1
Rkc, 1 Rkb, 1
Rka )
Corollary 2.5. Let be M an interior point of triangleABC. Then for every real numberk∈[0,1]we have
a).
R12kRkc +R2k2 Rka+R2k3 Rkb ≥R2k1 R3k+R2k2 Rk1+R32kRk2 b).
R2k1 Rk3
√ RkbRck
+ R2k2 Rk1
√RkcRka + R2k3 Rk2
√ RakRkb
≤R2k1 +R2k2 +R2k3
c).
R12kRk3
√ Rka
Rkb +R2k2 R1k
√ Rkb
Rkc +R2k3 Rk2
√ Rkc
Rka ≤R2k2 Rbk+R2k3 Rkc +R12kRka d).
R2k1 Rk2
√ Rka
Rkb +R2k2 Rk3
√ Rkb
Rkc +R2k3 R1
√ Rkc
Rka ≤R2k3 Rkb +R2k1 Rkc +R2k2 Rka Proof. We take
(λ1, λ2, λ3) = ( Rk2
Rk1Rk3, Rk3 Rk1Rk2, R1k
Rk2Rk3, )
in Theorem 1 and 2
Corollary 2.6. Let be M an interior point of triangleABC. Then for every real numberk∈[0,1]we have
a).
Rka R2k2 + Rkb
R2k3 + Rkc R2k1 ≥ 1
R1k + 1 Rk2 + 1
Rk3 b).
1
Rk3
√ RkbRkc
+ 1
Rk1√
RkcRka + 1 R2k
√ RkaRkb
≤ 1 R2k1 + 1
R2k2 + 1 R2k3
Proof. We take in Theorem 1:
(λ1, λ2, λ3) = ( 1
R2k2 , 1 R2k3 , 1
R2k1 )
Theorem 3. Let beM a interior point of triangleABC. Then for every real numberk∈[0,1]we have a).
RaRbRc
R1R2R3 ≥ 1 81k ·
∏ (bk+ck)1/k
abc ≥1 b).
∏ (Rk3 Rkb +Rk2
Rkc )
≤ 64 (abc)k
∏(bk+ck) ≤8
Proof. From the inequalitiesR1≥ car2+abr3, R1≥ abr2+car3 and(x+y)k≥2k−1(
xk+yk) ,if k∈[0,1]it result.
Rk1≥ (b
ar2+ c ar3
)k
≥2k−1 (bk
akrk2+ck akr3k
)
and
Rk1≥ (c
ar2+ b ar3
)k
≥2k−1 (ck
akrk2+bk akr3k
)
Adding the last two inequalities we obtain
2Rk1 ≥2k−1 [
rk2
(bk+ck ak
) +rk3
(bk+ck ak
)]
= 2k−1(
r2k+rk3) (
bk+ck) ak
and the similar inequalities.
By multiplication we obtain:
8 (R1R2R3)k≥8k−1
∏ (r2k+rk3) (
bk+ck) akbkck Taking account by equalitiesr2=R2R3R1
b , r3= R2R1R2
c we obtain:
8 (R1R2R3)k≥8k−1∏ (Rk3R1k
2kRbk +Rk1Rk2 2kRkc
) ∏ (
bk+ck) akbkck or
64≥∏ (Rk3 Rkb +R2k
Rck ) ∏ (
bk+ck)
akbkck ≥8∏ (Rk3 Rkb +Rk2
Rkc )
or
∏ (Rk3 Rkb +Rk2
Rkc )
≤ 64akbkck
∏(bk+ck) ≤8
b). We have
64≥∏ (Rk3 Rkb +Rk2
Rkc ) ∏ (
bk+ck) akbkck ≥8
∏ (bk+ck)
akbkck · (R1R2R3)k (RaRbRc)k.