• Nu S-Au Găsit Rezultate

View of Combined Shepard operators with Chebyshev nodes

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "View of Combined Shepard operators with Chebyshev nodes"

Copied!
6
0
0

Text complet

(1)

Rev. Anal. Num´er. Th´eor. Approx., vol. 33 (2004) no. 1, pp. 73–78 ictp.acad.ro/jnaat

COMBINED SHEPARD OPERATORS WITH CHEBYSHEV NODES

CRISTINA O. OS¸ANand RADU T. TRˆIMBIT¸ AS¸

Abstract. In this paper we study combined Shepard-Lagrange univariate inter- polation operator

SL,mn,µ(Y;f, x) :=Sn,µL,m(f, x) =

n+1

P

k=0

|xyn,k|−µ(Lmf)(x, yn,k)

n+1

P

k=0

|xyn,k|−µ

,

where (yn,k) are the interpolation nodes and (Lmf)(x;yn,k) is the Lagrange interpolation polynomial with nodesyn,k,yn,k+1,yn,k+2,. . . ,yn,k+m, when the interpolation nodes (yn,k)k=1,nare the zeros of first kind Chebyshev polynomial completed with yn,0 = −1 and yn,n+1 = 1. We give a direct proof for error estimation and some numerical examples.

MSC 2000. 65D05, 41A05.

Keywords. Shepard interpolation, Chebyshev nodes.

1. INTRODUCTION

Let Y = yn,i∈[−1,1]; i= 0, n+ 1; n∈N be an infinite matrix where each row is a set of distinct points in [−1,1]. ForfCm([−1,1]) the Shepard- Lagrange operator is defined by

(1) Sn,µL,m(Y;f, x) :=Sn,µL,m(f, x) =

n+1

P

k=0

|x−yn,k|−µ(Lmf)(x, yn,k)

n+1

P

k=0

|x−yn,k|−µ

,

wherem∈N,m < nis prescribed.

The Shepard-Lagrange operator was treated in [1] and [6]. Its most impor- tant properties are: it preserves polynomials of degree m, i.e.,

Sn,µL,m(ej;x) =ej(x), j= 0, m, whereej(x) =xi. Also,

Sn,µL,m(f;yn,k) =f(yn,k), k= 1, n.

“Babe¸s-Bolyai” University, Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, str. M.

Kogˇalniceanu 1, 400084 Cluj-Napoca, Romania, e-mail: [email protected].

“Babe¸s-Bolyai” University, Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, str. M.

Kog˘alniceanu 1, 400084 Cluj-Napoca, Romania, e-mail: [email protected].

(2)

In this paper we give an error estimation analogous to that given in [6], but the present proof is direct and exploits the properties of Cebyshev nodes and Lagrange interpolation polynomials with such nodes.

2. ERROR ESTIMATION

If fCp([a, b]), p ∈ N, p < m, and (Lmf) is the m-th degree Lagrange interpolation polynomial with nodes x0, x1, . . . , xm ∈ [a, b], the following error estimation holds (see [3])

(2) kf −LmfkCp(b−a)p logmpmω f(p);m−pb−a, whereCp >0.

Let (yn,k)k=0,n+1 be the set of the roots of first kindn-th degree Chebyshev polynomial, completed with yn,0 = −1 and yn,n+1 = 1. For k = 1, n, yn,k = cosθn,k, where θn,k = (2k−1)π/(2n).

Remark 1. We have

n,kθn,k+1|= πn.

The following theorem holds:

Theorem 1. If fCp([−1,1]) and µ > p+ 1, we have (3) f(x)−Sn,µL,m(f;x)(1−xnµ−12)p

Z 1 n−1

ω(f(p);t 1−x2) tµ−p dt.

Proof. Letyn,d be the closest point to x. We share the nod set (yn,k) into three classes: k= 0, d−m;k=dm+ 1, d;k=d+ 1, n+ 1.

Equations (1) and (2) imply

f(x)−Sn,µL,m(f;x)

n+1

X

k=0

x−yn,d x−yn,k

µ|f(x)−(Lmf)(x, yn,k)|

Cplogmpm

"d−m X

k=0

x−yn,d

x−yn,k

µ|x−yn,k|pω f(p);|x−ym−pn,k|

+

d

X

k=d−m+1

x−yn,d x−yn,k

µ|yn,k+myn,k|pω f(p);|yn,k+mm−p−yn,k|+

+

n+1

X

k=d+1

x−yn,d

x−yn,k

µ|x−yn,k+m|pω f(p);|x−ym−pn,k+m|

:=Cplogm

mp (S1+S2+S3).

(3)

We also have

|x−yn,d| ≤πnp1−x2, (4)

|x−yn,k| ≥πn|k−d|p1−x2, (5)

|x−yn,k+m| ≤ |x−yn,k|+πmn. (6)

We shall also use the following properties for modulus of continuity δ2 ≥δ1ω(f;δδ 2)

2ω(f;δδ 1)

1 , (7)

ω(f;λδ)≤(1 +λ)ω(f;δ) if λ∈R+, (8)

δ1 ≤δ2ω(f;δ1)≤ω(f;δ2), (9)

ω(f;δ1+δ2)≤ω(f;δ1) +ω(f;δ2).

(10)

Now, it follows the estimations for S1,S2, and S3. S1=

d−m

X

k=0

x−yn,d x−yn,k

µ|x−yn,k|pω f(p);|x−ym−pn,k|.

From (7) forδ1:= πn|k−d|

1−x2 and δ2 :=|x−yn,k|we have

ω(f(p);|x−yn,k|)

|x−yn,k| ≤ 2n(π+1)

π|k−d| 1−x2. We obtain

S1c1

1−x2 n

p

·

d−m

X

k=0 1

|k−d|µ−p ω f(p);|k−d|n p1−x2 with

c1 =2πp(π+ 1)1 +m−p1 , S2 =

d

X

k=d−m+1

x−yn,d

x−yn,k

µ|yn,k+myn,k|pω f(p);|yn,k+mm−p−yn,k|.

Since |yn,k+myn,k| ≤ n

1−x2 we have

ω f(p);|yn,k+mm−p−yn,k|≤ 1 +m−p1 (mπ+ 1)ω f(p);

1−x2 n

. We obtain

S2c2

1−x2 n

p

ω f(p);

1−x2 n

with

c2 = (mπ)p(mπ+ 1)p(m−1) 1 +m−p1 ,

S3 =

n+1

X

k=d+1

x−yn,d

x−yn,k

µ|x−yn,k+m|pω f(p);|x−ym−pn,k+m|.

(4)

ForS3 we remark that

|x−yn,k+m|p≤(|x−yn,k|+|yn,k+myn,k|)p

=

p

X

r=0 p r

|x−yn,k|p−r|yn,k+myn,k|r. Now, we have

S3 ≤ |x−yn,d|µ

n+1

X

k=d+1 p

X

r=0 p r

|yn,k−yn,k+m|r

|x−yn,k|µ−p+r ω f(p);|x−ym−pn,k+m|

πp

1−x2 n

p p X

r=0 p r

mr n+1

P

k=d+1 1

|k−d|µ−p ω f(p);|x−ym−pn,k+m|

= 1+m−p1 πp(m+1)p

1−x2 n

p n+1

X

k=d+1 1

|k−d|µ−p ω f(p);|x−yn,k+m|. We remark that for µp >1,Pn+1k=d+1|k−d|p−µis bounded byM.

From this observation and (10), (7) we obtain ω f(p);|x−yn,k+m|

M(mπ+ 1)ω f(p);

1−x2 n

+ 2(π+ 1)ω f(p);|k−d|n p1−x2. In conclusion, we obtain forS3 the following inequality

S3

1−x2 n

p

c3ω f(p);

1−x2 n

+c4 n+1

X

k=d+1

ω f(p);|k−d|n 1−x2

|k−d|µ−p

with the constants

c3=πp(m+ 1)pM(mπ+ 1) 1 + m−p1 , c4= 2πp(m+ 1)p(π+ 1) 1 + m−p1 . Since

ω f(p);

1−x2 n

nµ−p−11

Z 1

n−1

ω f(p);t

1−x2 tµ−p dt and

S1+S2+S3

1−x2 n

ph

C(c2, c3ω f(p);

1−x2 n

+C(c1, c4ω f(p);|k−d|n p1−x2i

(3) follows.

(5)

3. EXAMPLES AND GRAPHS

Let us consider the functionf : [−1,1]→R, f(x) = sinπx.

Its graph appears in figure 1, together with the Shepard-Lagrange approxima- tion functions forµ∈ {2,4},n= 16 andm∈ {1,2}.

−1 −0.8 −0.6 −0.4 −0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

−1.5

−1

−0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5

(a) Graph off.

−1 −0.8 −0.6 −0.4 −0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

−1.5

−1

−0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5

(b) Shepard-Lagrange, n = 16, µ= 2,m= 1.

−1 −0.8 −0.6 −0.4 −0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

−1.5

−1

−0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5

(c) Shepard-Lagrange, n = 16, µ= 2,m= 2.

−1 −0.8 −0.6 −0.4 −0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

−1.5

−1

−0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5

(d) Shepard-Lagrange, n = 16, µ= 4,m= 1.

−1 −0.8 −0.6 −0.4 −0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

−1.5

−1

−0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5

(e) Shepard-Lagrange, n = 16, µ= 4,m= 2.

Fig. 1. Graph off and various Shepard-Lagrange interpolants.

(6)

REFERENCES

[1] Gh. Comanand R. Trˆımbit¸as¸,Combined Shepard univariate operators, East Journal on Approximations,7, no. 4, pp. 471–483, 2001.

[2] G. CriscuoloandG. Mastroianni,Estimates of the Shepard interpolatory procedure, Acta. Math. Hung.,61, nos. 1–2, pp. 79–91, 1993.

[3] M. Crouzeix and A. L. Mignot, Analyse num´erique des ´equations diff´erentielles, 2e´edition, Masson, Paris, 1989.

[4] B. Della Vecchia and G. Mastroianni, Pointwise estimates of rational operators based on general distribution of knots, Facta Universitatis (Niˇs), Ser. Math. Inform.,6, pp. 63–78, 1991.

[5] B. Della Vecchia and G. Mastroianni, Pointwise simultaneous approximation by rational operators, J. Approx. Theory,65, pp. 140–154, 1991.

[6] R. Trˆımbit¸as¸, Univariate Shepard-Lagrange interpolation, Kragujevac J. Math., 24, pp. 85–94, 2002.

[7] D. Shepard,A two dimensional interpolation function for irregularly spaced data, Proc.

23rd Nat. Conf. ACM, pp. 517–523, 1968.

Received by the editors: August 5, 2003.

Referințe

DOCUMENTE SIMILARE

We present a new convergence proof for classic multivariate Shepard formulae within the context of Korovkin-type convergence results for positive operators on spaces of continuous

In the present paper we establish direct and inverse local properties for the Sz´ asz-Durrmeyer operators1. These operators are introduced in [1] and independently considered in [4]

In [2] it is shown that the convergence order of the iterative methods given by (6) cannot be greater than 2, even if the number of the interpolation nodes is arbitrarily

The convergence order of our method is greater or equal to the number of the controlled nodes used in the Lagrange-type inverse interpolation, which, in its turn, is substantial

In the present paper we consider weighted integrals and develop ex- plicit quadrature formulae of Gauss–Christoffel–Stancu type using simple Gauss- ian nodes and multiple fixed

We shall considered some particular cases when the existence and the uniqueness of Birkhoff interpolation polynomial is guar- anteed and the corresponding Shepard-type operators..

Introiluction : So far we studied interpolation operators giving elegant proof of Jackson's and, Timan's theorem for differentiable func- tioäs cteffned.. We formally

The Hosoya polynomial of a molecular graph G is defined as where the sum is over all unordered pairs {u,v} of distinct vertices in G.. In this paper an algorithm for computing