• Nu S-Au Găsit Rezultate

View of Predictors and Outcomes of Pediatric COVID 19 Cases in Recent Scenario: Systematic Review & Meta Analysis

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "View of Predictors and Outcomes of Pediatric COVID 19 Cases in Recent Scenario: Systematic Review & Meta Analysis"

Copied!
7
0
0

Text complet

(1)

Predictors and Outcomes of Pediatric COVID 19 Cases in Recent Scenario:

Systematic Review & Meta Analysis

Dr. Amruta.C. Naik1, Dr. SanjuSundeepBhargeva2,Dr. M. BagavathyPerumal3, Dr.

Sathyanarayanan R4, Dr. Aravinth R5, Dr. Puneeta Vohra6, Dr. Heena Tiwari7

1MDS, Consultant Pediatric and preventive dentist, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

[email protected]

2MDS, Public Health Dentistry, Senior Resident, Government Dental College, Hyderabad, Telangana. [email protected]

3MD (Paed). Associate Professor, Department of Pediatrics, KKGMCH, Kanyakumari.

[email protected]

4Professor and HOD, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental Science, Pondicherry. [email protected]

5Post Graduate Resident, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Indira Gandhi Institute Of Dental Science, Pondicherry. [email protected]

6Professor ,Dept Of Oral Medicine And Radiology, Faculty Of Dental Sciences , SGT University, Gurgaon, Haryana, [email protected]

7BDS, PGDHHM, MPH Student, ParulUniveristy, Limda, Waghodia, Vadodara, Gujrat, [email protected]

Corresponding Author:

Dr. Amruta.C. Naik, MDS, Consultant Pediatric and preventive dentist, Pune, Maharashtra, India. [email protected]

ABSTRACT:

Background – Studies summarizing the clinical findings of COVID 19 in children are lacking.

So, we aimed to provide a comprehensive meta-analysis and systematic review of previously published papers related to clinical features and lab findings of COVID -19 in pediatric population.

Methods – a systematic search and meta-analysis of scientific literatures was conducted by using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Medline, google Scholar databases. Studies were reviewed for methodological quality, and random-effects model was used to conduct the primary meta- analysis. I2 value and Egger’s test was used to estimate heterogeneity and publication bias respectively.

Results – we reviewed 10 eligible studies that included 1215 pediatric population with PCR tested COVID -19 positive. The most frequent symptoms were fever, cough, vomiting, diarrhea, sore throat, and dyspnea. Regarding the combined results of the meta-analysis, fever (60%), cough (78%), dyspnea (74%) and pharyngalgia (59%) were the most widely reported symptom.

Besides, positive RT-PCR test results, elevated inflammatory markers including Procal (92 %), D- Dimer (82%) and CRP (73 % ) were the most common laboratory findings.

Conclusion - COVID-19 is prevalent across all pediatric age-groups and presents with varying degree of symptomology. However, children have a milder course of the disease with extremely favorable prognosis.Future longitudinal studies are needed to confirm our findings and better

(2)

understand which patients are at increased risk for developing severe inflammation and multi organ failure.

Key words: Pediatric, COVID 19, Outcomes, Predictors.

INTRODUCTION

In December 2019, a sudden outbreak of pneumonia cases of unknown origin emerged from Wuhan, China. . Till 3 Jan. 2020 a total of 44 pneumonia cases were detected. On 7 Jan2020, Chinese research authorities were announced that they were isolated new virus from sea food market in Wuhan city; Named as 2019-nCoV. Though the SARS-CoV-2 originated from bats, the intermediary animal through which it crossed over to humans is uncertain.1 Coronaviruses are enveloped positive sense RNA viruses ranging from 60 nm to 140 nm in diameter with spike like projections on its surface giving it a crown like appearance under the electron microscope; hence the name coronavirus.2 Differential diagnosis is important in current scenario as it includes all types of respiratory viral infections [influenza, parainfluenza, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), adenovirus, human metapneumovirus, non COVID-19 coronavirus], atypical organisms (mycoplasma, chlamydia) and bacterial infections. It is not possible to differentiate COVID-19 from these infections clinically or through routine lab tests. Specific diagnosis is by specific molecular tests on respiratory samples (throat swab/ nasopharyngeal swab/ sputum/ endotracheal aspirates and bronchoalveolar lavage).

MATERIAL AND METHODS:

PRISMA FLOW CHART

Search strategy and selection criteria

Our systemic review and meta analysis adhere to the guidelines established by preferred reporting items (ie PRISMA).3This comprehensive search from 2019 to 2020 was conducted in the following databases – PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Medline, googlescholar using various

(3)

Wuhan coronavirus, Wuhan Pneumonia and pediatric or neonate or new born or infant or children or adolescence. Title and abstract screening was conducted by two investigators and results were also reviewed by two authors (conventional double screening). Full texts of selected studies were reviewed and 10 publications were selected for meta analysis. Excluded articles included those that did not contain relevant and adequate data concerning clinical features, lab findings; exclusively neonatal or specific age group studies; comorbidities and non English publications.

Data extraction and quality assessment

Following the full text screening for eligibility all relevant data was collected included author, the type of article (e.g. case series), publication year, country of origin, number of pediatric patients, clinical symptoms (e.g. cough, fever ), lab findings (e.g. D-dimer).

RESULTS:

Data analysis

Primary outcomes of study were – clinical symptoms, lab markers. I2 index was used to assess heterogeneity with values 25%, 50% and 75% representing low, moderate, high heterogenecity.4 If analysis included more than three studies, egger precision weighted linear regression was used to test potential publication bias, with p-value <0.05 considered significant for publication bias.

If publication bias was present, the trim and fill method was performed to evaluate the effect(data not shown). Meta-analysis was performed using metapackages in R (version 3.6.0).

Meta analysis

Meta-analysis was conducted on 9 clinical symptoms and 9 laboratory markers. Overall, 67 % of the patient population were with headache (67 % ), fever (60 % ), and cough (78%), being the most common symptoms. The remaining clinical symptoms had an overall estimated prevalence of <20 %. Among commonly reported laboratory findings, elevated inflammatory markers including Procal (92 %), D- Dimer (82%) and CRP (73 % ) were the most common. Decreased lymphocytes (50 % ) and leukocytes (71%) were also more common than elevated counts of these immunological markers.

Table 1: Characteristics of the included studies on COVID – 19/20

Study Location N Age Gender (male)

Dong, Y. et al 12 China 728 10 (4-15) 418

Bai K. et al 20 China 25 11 (6.3 – 14.5) 14

Qiu , H. et al 13 China 36 8.3 ± 3.5 23

Song, W. et al 21 China 16 8 (11.5 – 14) 10

Shekerdemian, L.S.

22

Canada 48 13 (4.2 – 16.6) 25

Feng et al 23 China 15 4 – 14 5

Tagarro et al 24 Spain 41 <18 18

Rahimzadeh et al 25 Iran 9 2 – 10 6

Bialek et al 26 United States

291 <18 165

Hu et al 27 China 6 <15 3

(4)

Table 2: Summary of the study characteristics and results of meta-analysis of clinical and laboratory findings in pediatric COVID-19 patients. Abbreviations: GI: Gastrointestinal;

LDH: Lactate Dehydrogenase; AST: Aspartate transaminase; ALT: Alanine transaminase;

ESR: Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate; CRP: C reactive protein; Procal:Procalcitonin.

Clinical and lab variables

Number of studies

Total patients I2 (%) Egger’s test P - value

Fever 9 388 60 % 0.670

Cough 7 357 78 % 0.353

Dyspnea 7 215 74 % 0.006

Sore throat 6 50 59 % 0.005

Rhinorrhea 9 38 52 % 0.600

Congestion 4 17 75 % 0.125

Headache 5 95 67 % 0.960

Fatigue 6 53 59 % 0.373

GI symptoms 8 21 70 % 0.660

Leukocytosis 5 49 62 % 0.034

Leukopenia 3 30 71 % 0.396

Lymphopenia 4 21 50 % 0.020

Procal 3 60 92 % 0.030

D – Dimer 4 20 82 % 0.045

CRP 5 100 73 % 0.002

LDH 3 45 68 % 0.091

ESR 3 89 76 % 0.784

AST/ALT 4 65 0 % 0.065

DISCUSSION

In the last 6 months, worldwide cases of SARS-COV2 infection & our knowledge of the disease and its epidemiologic and new clinical characteristics continue to evolve. It was first reported in Wuhan city in China in December 2019. Rapidly emerging the new mutants of this novel virus is threat and identification of clinical features and lab findings is essential to guide good clinical care, predict severity and to determine prognosis. COVID-19 is present across all age ranges.

Based on current evidence, there does not appear to be any age restriction for COVID-19 susceptibility.5 However, substantial evidence has established that compared to adults, children only account for a small number of COVID-19 case.6 In our meta-analysis of COVID-19 prevalence across various pediatric age groups the distribution of cases varied but was highly frequent (21–25 %) in the 8 - 15 year-old age range . Similar observations were made by G¨otzinger et al. in a large European study.7Similarly, in regard to common clinical indicators, fever, cough, and headache accounted for the most dominant symptoms while sore throat, rhinorrhea, and GI symptoms were rare. The primary mechanism of SARS-CoV2 pathogenesis is thought to involve its interaction with human ACE-2 receptors leading to T-cell activation and subsequent inflammatory response. In the early stage, viral copy numbers can be high in the lower respiratory tract. Inflammatory signaling molecules are released by infected cells and alveolar macrophages in addition to recruited T lymphocytes, monocytes, and neutrophils. In the late stage, pulmonary edema can fill the alveolar spaces with hyaline membrane formation, compatible with early-phase acute respiratory distress syndrome. This pro-inflammatory state

(5)

abnormalities commonly seen in infected patients. Previous studies including infections caused by other novel coronaviruses have reported typically normal or reduced immunological markers with normal to elevated LDH and D-dimer levels. Our findings were consistent with higher prevalence of leukopenia and lymphopenia as well as elevated levels of D-dimer and LDH.

However, the most common laboratory markers seen in our study were elevated Procalcitonin and CRP consistent with a highly inflammatory state.8,9 These clinical markers alone however are non-specific, thus limiting their clinical utility in absence of a strong clinical correlation to the patient’s history and physical symptoms. Overall, these clinical symptoms and laboratory markers are highly non-specific and provide little evidence of COVID-19 infection when assessed individually. Clinicians should not diagnose or rule out COVID-19 infection solely based on any one of these findings, but synthesize information based on prevalence of common features as evidenced in ours and other studies. Although SARS-CoV2 infection was first identified in China, the United States has now amassed the highest number of confirmed cases.10 Calculations made on June 4th, 2020 from the COVID-19 Dashboard by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering at Johns Hopkins University indicate that China has 45 % of total confirmed COVID-19 cases compared to the United States. 11 As expected, the most common vector for childhood infection is close contact to an affected family member or residing in an area with a high population of cases. Our findings align with the results of an April 2020 report by Dong et al, in which there was a clear trend that the disease spread rapidly from a Chinese province to surrounding provinces and cities in children on December to February.12. Furthermore, Qiu and colleague studied 36 pediatric COVID-19 positive patients in which ten patients (28%) were symptomatic latent cases identified secondary to an adult family member who was infected, symptomatic, or traveled to an endemic area.13This lends concern that children, who may be asymptomatic, may play a role in community transmission of the virus.

Little is known about the perinatal aspects of COVID-19, and there have been several reported cases of neonatal infection, suggesting a possible perinatal or vertical transmission during pregnancy.14 However, in a report by Chen et al., all nine neonates born to COVID-19 positive mothers tested negative for the virus after cesarean delivery.15 In another study by Zhang et al., 10 neonates from COVID-19 positive mother all tested negative for the infection.16 Moreover, this is further supported by analysis of breast milk and placental pathologic specimens from COVID-19 positive mothers, which have returned negative for the virus. Lastly, vertical transmission was not observed with either SARS-CoV-1 or in MERS-CoV17therefore, it is unlikely that maternal vertical transmission during third trimester occurs, or is likely very rare.

However, from the limited data published, we cannot determine the consequences of SARS- CoV-2 infection in early pregnancy and if it can be transmitted to fetus and hinder organ development, malformations, growth abnormalities, or even lead to premature labor or spontaneous abortions. 18,19

AKNOWLEDGEMENT:

We thank Dr. HemanadhKolli, BDS, MPH, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois, USA for final editing and reviewing the manuscript.

REFERENCES:

1. Indian J Pediatr. 2020; 87(4): 281–286. Published online 2020 Mar 13.

2. Richman DD, Whitley RJ, Hayden FG. Clinical Virology, 4th ed. Washington: ASM Press;

2016.

(6)

3. D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, D.G. Altman, P. Group, Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement, PLoS Med. 6 (July (7)) (2009) e1000097, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

4. J.P. Higgins, S.G. Thompson, Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis, Stat.Med. 21 (11) (2002) 1539–1558, https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186

5. R. Castagnoli, M. Votto, A. Licari, et al., Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in children and adolescents: a systematic review, JAMA Pediatr.

(April) (2020), https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.1467

6. COVID-19 -Information for Pediatric Healthcare Providers, CDC: CDC, 2020

7. F. G¨otzinger, B. Santiago-García, A. Noguera-Juli´an, et al., COVID-19 in children and adolescents in Europe: a multinational, multicentre cohort study, Lancet Child Adolesc.

Health (June) (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30177-2.

8. K. Pandit, S. Gupta, A.G. Sharma, Clinico-pathogenesis of COVID-19 in children, IJBB 57 (3) (2020).

9. P. Zimmermann, N. Curtis, Coronavirus infections in children including COVID-19: an overview of the epidemiology, clinical features, diagnosis, treatment and prevention options in children, Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 39 (5) (2020) 355–368, https://doi.org/10.1097/INF.0000000000002660.

10. SouzaT, NadalJ, NogueiraR, PereiraR, BrandaoM. Clinical manifestations of children with COVID-19: a systematic review. PediatrPulmonol 2020 June3. doi:10.1002/ppul.24885 11. Johns Hopkins University and Medicine. Corona virus resource center.

Coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html (accessedJune3,2020)

12. DongY, MoX, HuY, et al. Epidemiological characteristics of 2143 pediatric patients with 2019 corona virus disease in china. Pediatrics 2020 March 17. doi:10.1542/peds.2020-0702 13. QiuH, WuJ, HongL, LuoY, SongQ, ChenD. Clinical and epidemiological features of 36

children with corona virus disease 2019 (COVID19) in Zhejiang. China Observat Cohort Study Lancet Infect Dis 2020 March 25. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30198-5.

14. DongL, TianJ, HeS, et al. Possible vertical transmission of sarscov2 from an infected mother to hernew born. JAMA 2020 March26. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.4621.

15. ChenH,GuoJ,WangC,etal.Clinicalcharacteristics,andintrauterineverticaltransmissionpotential ofCOVID19infectioninninepregnantwomen:aretrospectivereviewofmedicalrecords.Lancet20 20;395:809–1510.1016/S0140-6736(20)30360-3.

16. ZhangL,JiangY,WeiM,etal.[AnalysisofthepregnancyoutcomesinpregnantwomenwithCOVID -

19inHubeiProvince].ZhonghuaFuChanKeZaZhi2020;55:E009.doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn112141- 20200218-00111.

17. ChenS,HuangB,LuoDJ,etal.[Pregnantwomenwithnewcoronavirusinfection:aclinicalcharacter isticsandplacentalpathologicalanalysisofthreecases].Zhonghuabinglixuezazhi2020;49:E005.d oi:10.3760/cma.j.cn112151-20200225-00138.

18. RasmussenSA,SmulianJC,LednickyJA,WenTS,JamiesonDJ.Coronavirusdisease2019(COVI D-

19)andpregnancy:whatobstetriciansneedtoknow.AmJObstetGynecol2020February24.doi:10.

1016/j.ajog.2020.02.017.

19. MimouniF,LakshminrusimhaS,PearlmanSA,RajuT,GallagherPG,MendlovicJ.Perinatalaspect sonthecovid-19pandemic:apracticalresourceforperinatal-neo-

natalspecialists.JPerinatol2020;40:820–6.doi:10.1038/s41372-020-0665-6.

(7)

20. K. Bai, W. Liu, C. Liu, et al., Clinical analysis of 25 COVID-19 infections in children, Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 39 (7) (2020) e100–e103, https://doi.org/10.1097/

INF.0000000000002740

21. W. Song, J. Li, N. Zou, W. Guan, J. Pan, W. Xu, Clinical features of pediatric patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19), J. Clin. Virol. 127 (2020), 104377,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104377.

22. L.S. Shekerdemian, N.R. Mahmood, K.K. Wolfe, et al., Characteristics and outcomes of children with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection admitted to US and Canadian Pediatric Intensive Care Units, JAMA Pediatr. (May) (2020), https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.1948.

23. Feng K, Yun YX, Wang XF, et al. Analysis of CT features of 15 children with 2019 novel coronavirus infection. ZhonghuaErKeZaZhi 2020;58:E007

24. Tagarro A, Epalz C, Santos M, et al. Screening and severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in children in Madrid, Spain. JAMA Pediatr 2020;e201346.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.1346 [Online ahead of print].

25. Rahimzadeh G, EkramiNoghabi M, KadkhodaeiElyaderani F, et al. COVID-19 infection in Iranian children: a case series of 9 patients. J Pediatr Rev 2020;8:139–44.

26. Bialek S, Gierke R, Hughes M, et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 in children – United States, February 12–April 2. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2020;69:422–6.

27. Hu Z, Song C, Xu C, et al. Clinical characteristics of 24 asymptomatic infections with COVID-19 screened among close contacts in Nanjing, China. Sci China Life Sci 2020;63:706–11.

Referințe

DOCUMENTE SIMILARE

The aim of present Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis was determine prevalence of malignant lesions in the oral cavity of children.. Method: From the electronic databases,

If steroids are given for longer duration than required, it may cause fungal infection like black fungus, hyperglycemia, suppress natural immune response, which

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-anal- ysis is to assess the accuracy of chest US for the early diagnosis of pneumothorax in adult trauma patients.. Summary

Aims: The present study investigated and evaluated the accuracy of thoracic ultrasonography (TUS) in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) by conducting a systematic review

Notulae Scientia Biologicae is a quarterly peer-reviewed journal aimed at disseminating significant research and original papers, critical reviews and short reviews on life

Systematic review and meta- analysis of magnetic resonance imaging features for di- agnosis of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder.. Determination of magnetic resonance

The above results suggest two important conclusions for the study: The factors affecting the adoption of the de-internationalization strategy for both case A and case B,

For two cases of intussusceptions with colocolic involvement (ileocolocolic and colocolic intussuscep- tions located in right upper quadrant and left lower quadrant, respectively),